LUNR vs. MTAL, NN, IPAX, CODA, LGST, AKLI, GETR, MIND, BOWL, and NOC
Should you be buying Intuitive Machines stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Intuitive Machines include Metals Acquisition (MTAL), NextNav (NN), Inflection Point Acquisition (IPAX), Coda Octopus Group (CODA), Semper Paratus Acquisition (LGST), Akili (AKLI), Getaround (GETR), MIND Technology (MIND), Bowlero (BOWL), and Northrop Grumman (NOC).
Metals Acquisition (NYSE:MTAL) and Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, community ranking, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.
Metals Acquisition has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.
87.5% of Metals Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Metals Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.7% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Metals Acquisition currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.72%. Intuitive Machines has a consensus target price of $10.25, suggesting a potential upside of 104.59%. Given Metals Acquisition's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Metals Acquisition.
Metals Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Metals Acquisition's net margin of -19.48%. Intuitive Machines' return on equity of 0.00% beat Metals Acquisition's return on equity.
Intuitive Machines received 16 more outperform votes than Metals Acquisition when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave Intuitive Machines an outperform vote while only 77.78% of users gave Metals Acquisition an outperform vote.
Intuitive Machines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Metals Acquisition.
In the previous week, Metals Acquisition had 3 more articles in the media than Intuitive Machines. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Metals Acquisition and 10 mentions for Intuitive Machines. Metals Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.26 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Intuitive Machines beats Metals Acquisition on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Intuitive Machines News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LUNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Intuitive Machines Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
