SM vs. EQT, MRO, RRC, SWN, MTDR, CRK, KOS, SBOW, EGY, and BRY
Should you be buying SM Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of SM Energy include EQT (EQT), Marathon Oil (MRO), Range Resources (RRC), Southwestern Energy (SWN), Matador Resources (MTDR), Comstock Resources (CRK), Kosmos Energy (KOS), SilverBow Resources (SBOW), VAALCO Energy (EGY), and Berry (BRY). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.
SM Energy (NYSE:SM) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their community ranking, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.
SM Energy has a net margin of 31.80% compared to EQT's net margin of 10.96%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.10% beat EQT's return on equity.
SM Energy received 11 more outperform votes than EQT when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 68.20% of users gave EQT an outperform vote while only 65.67% of users gave SM Energy an outperform vote.
SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. EQT pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. SM Energy pays out 11.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EQT pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
EQT has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
SM Energy has a beta of 4.15, meaning that its share price is 315% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, SM Energy and SM Energy both had 9 articles in the media. SM Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat EQT's score of 1.17 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.
94.6% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
SM Energy presently has a consensus price target of $54.57, suggesting a potential upside of 16.06%. EQT has a consensus price target of $45.24, suggesting a potential upside of 11.58%. Given SM Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SM Energy is more favorable than EQT.
Summary
SM Energy beats EQT on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get SM Energy News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
SM Energy Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
