GSM vs. LAC, NEXA, NGD, LAAC, MTAL, CRML, TMC, MP, HBM, and UUUU
Should you be buying Ferroglobe stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferroglobe include Lithium Americas (LAC), Nexa Resources (NEXA), New Gold (NGD), Lithium Americas (Argentina) (LAAC), Metals Acquisition (MTAL), Critical Metals (CRML), TMC the metals (TMC), MP Materials (MP), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), and Energy Fuels (UUUU). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.
Ferroglobe (NASDAQ:GSM) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, community ranking, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.
Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $11.46, indicating a potential upside of 156.28%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Ferroglobe.
Ferroglobe received 408 more outperform votes than Lithium Americas when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 71.38% of users gave Ferroglobe an outperform vote while only 60.59% of users gave Lithium Americas an outperform vote.
Ferroglobe has a net margin of 3.92% compared to Lithium Americas' net margin of 0.00%. Ferroglobe's return on equity of 15.04% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.
In the previous week, Ferroglobe had 4 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Ferroglobe and 17 mentions for Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Ferroglobe's score of 0.24 indicating that Lithium Americas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
89.6% of Ferroglobe shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Ferroglobe shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Lithium Americas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Ferroglobe has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas.
Summary
Ferroglobe beats Lithium Americas on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferroglobe News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Ferroglobe Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
