WISH vs. AKA, LVLU, LGCB, HOUR, DIBS, SFIX, QRTEA, MYTE, DDL, and HEPS
Should you be buying ContextLogic stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of ContextLogic include a.k.a. Brands (AKA), Lulu's Fashion Lounge (LVLU), Linkage Global (LGCB), Hour Loop (HOUR), 1stdibs.Com (DIBS), Stitch Fix (SFIX), Qurate Retail (QRTEA), MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), Dingdong (Cayman) (DDL), and D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. (HEPS). These companies are all part of the "catalog & mail - order houses" industry.
a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, community ranking, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.
In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 5 more articles in the media than ContextLogic. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for ContextLogic. ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.
a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.
55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $14.50, suggesting a potential downside of 44.59%. Given ContextLogic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than ContextLogic.
a.k.a. Brands has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
ContextLogic received 15 more outperform votes than a.k.a. Brands when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 47.89% of users gave ContextLogic an outperform vote while only 31.15% of users gave a.k.a. Brands an outperform vote.
a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -18.11% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -131.05%. ContextLogic's return on equity of -17.80% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.
Summary
a.k.a. Brands beats ContextLogic on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get ContextLogic News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WISH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WISH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
ContextLogic Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
