J. M. Smucker Q3 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

AlphaStreet
Provided by AlphaStreet
February 27, 2024
Skip to Questions & Answers
Operator

Good morning, and welcome to the J.M. Smucker Company's Fiscal 2024 Third Quarter Earnings Question-and-Answer session. This conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions].

I'll now turn the conference over to Aaron Broholm, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Aaron Broholm
Vice President, Investor Relations at J. M. Smucker

Good morning and thank you for joining our fiscal 2024 third quarter earnings question-and-answer session. I hope everyone had a chance to review our results as detailed in this morning's press release and management's prepared remarks which are available on our corporate website at jmsmucker.com. We will also post an audio replay of this call at the conclusion of this morning's Q&A session. During today's call, we may make forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations about future plans and performance.

These statements rely on assumptions and estimates, and actual results may differ materially due to risks and uncertainties. Additionally, we use non-GAAP results to evaluate performance internally. I encourage you to read the full disclosure concerning forward-looking statements and details on our non-GAAP measures in this morning's press release. Participating on this call are Mark Smucker, Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Tucker Marshall, Chief Financial Officer.

We will now open up the call for questions. Operator, please queue up the first question.

Skip to Participants
Operator

Thank you. The question-and-answer session will begin at this time. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Andrew Lazar from Barclays. Your line is alive.

Andrew Lazar
Analyst at Barclays

Great. Thanks so much. I guess to start, obviously, Smucker delivered 6% comparable sales growth in fiscal 3Q, and I think you expect something similar in the fourth quarter as well. With Uncrustables set to accelerate, as you talked about in the prepared remarks in the fourth quarter, trying to get a sense of what would be the offset or what you expect might slow to get back to that mid-single-digit range in the fourth quarter? Or is there some conservatism built in?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Andrew, good morning. We're certainly pleased with our third quarter performance. And as you've noted, we anticipate the business momentum to continue into the fourth quarter. Specifically, to your question, we would anticipate pet to slow down a bit in the fourth quarter, but still continue its momentum across the portfolio.

Andrew Lazar
Analyst at Barclays

Got it. And I guess just picking up on that thread, Pet Food comparable sales obviously increased about 20% in the quarter. And even if you take out about 6 points of growth from contract manufacturing, it was still pretty solid double-digit growth on the base within Pet. And obviously, you expect that to slow a bit. But I guess what -- was there something in anomalous in the third quarter that led to that -- that strength of growth in underlying pet that doesn't continue into the fourth quarter or the next few quarters? Thanks a lot.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Andrew, we did see a normalization of our pet supply chains specifically on the outlets in support of manufacturing that was a contributor to the third quarter and we would still anticipate in the fourth quarter that Pet grows double digits.

Andrew Lazar
Analyst at Barclays

Great, thanks so much. Appreciate it.

Operator

Thank you. Next question is from Ken Goldman from JP Morgan. Your line is now live.

Ken Goldman
Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Hi, good morning. Thank you. Last week, you mentioned that marketing would be a headwind to earnings next year. I think partly on Hostess and partly on the Base business, I believe. With the understanding that you're not quite in a position yet to give exact guidance. I was just hoping to get a little bit better sense of the degree or magnitude to which marketing for the total company may rise. And I'm asking, especially in light of this year, where I think you're a decent amount below your longer-term target range as a percent of sales. Thank you.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

And with respect to marketing associated with our sweet bake snacks business, we anticipate a step up in marketing in the coming quarters in support of the brand and our excitement of the portfolio and the opportunity to continue to advance and support the growth of the hostess brands or portfolio? We have contemplated that at the time of acquisition. We have contemplated that as we gave our outlook for this fiscal year. And we've contemplated that as we think about what potential contribution Hostess could provide for FY '25. Certainly, we look forward to providing a little bit more of the detail of what that step up is on our fourth quarter earnings call when we give the outlook for next fiscal year.

Ken Goldman
Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Okay, I'll follow up offline on that one. And then I wanted to ask, maybe I missed this, but transaction and integration, cash cost, I think you raised the number by around $20 million for that. In terms of your expectation for this year. Can you go into a little bit of why that was increased, unless I'm wrong about that, were these pulled forward from next year or are they additive to the total deal cost?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. So, it's really a pull forward of some expenses that we had thought would time out into next fiscal year. We have not raised our outlook for the overall transaction and integration expenses. It's more of an impact of timing.

Ken Goldman
Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Thanks, Tucker.

Operator

Thank you. Next question is coming from Peter Galbo from Bank of America. Your line is now live.

Peter Galbo
Analyst at Bank of America

Hey, guys. Good morning.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Good morning, Peter.

Peter Galbo
Analyst at Bank of America

Mark, maybe you could just expand a little bit on your prepared remarks around Uncrustables, specific to the retail channel. I know you had a difficult compare in the third quarter. And obviously, the away-from-home business is growing pretty nicely. But just what gives you the confidence, I guess, that you'll go from the minus to kind of do a double digit in the fourth quarter, specifically in retail?

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. Sure, Peter. Thanks for the question. If I may, I might just start a bit more high level on the total business and then answer your question specifically.

I think first and foremost, we feel great about our performance this quarter. We feel that it is, in many ways, a validating moment and our strategic journey. And I know that all of you on the call particularly our analysts, our sell-side community has been very closely watching us over the last three years along that journey, they reshape of our portfolio, the building of these capabilities, the focus on execution, the marketing expertise, the selling expertise, the supply chain resiliency, all of those things really, for us, helped to sort of validate that we've made the right decisions and choices along the way. And ultimately, it starts with the consumer and understanding what the consumer wants.

So I would like just to take a moment and just highlight how proud we are of these results, the underlying business momentum and that we have -- we feel very confident in the decisions that we've made and the way that we've been able to reshape our portfolio. As it relates specifically to Uncrustables, our confidence in that brand has not wavered. We're on track to start up the McCalla, Alabama facility this calendar year. And we knew that we were lapping of huge comp in the prior Q3 because the long month, Colorado, the second plant expansion was completed. And so we were able to gain a significant amount of distribution in last year's third quarter.

And so obviously, we were lapping that in the retail space. And in addition, we still saw -- in addition to the lap in the retail space, we still saw really good performance in both Canada and very strong performance in the Away From Home space.

But I think notably, if you look at consumer takeaway in the quarter, the consumer takeaway remains very strong, which again, helps to support our confidence in the double-digit growth and the reacceleration of the brand as we move forward into the next several quarters. And then I guess just one final point about Uncrustables, remember, we just turned on marketing. So we've had great -- not only the advertising, both in traditional and social channels, but also the endorsements that we've had across some of our professional sports, sponsorships and then our ability to continue to gain distribution in all of those channels just supports the confidence in that brand.

Peter Galbo
Analyst at Bank of America

Great. Thanks Mark. And Tucker, maybe just to follow up on the contract manufacturing sales. The number kind of keeps trickling down, I think, a bit quarter-on-quarter. Just you talked a little bit last week on kind of through the first six months of next year. But just any more color you can give us as we start to kind of model out that specific piece of it into next year?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. Peter, so we have an outlook for this fiscal year, and it's approximately $140 million. That's on a 12-month period. As we think about next year, we know that contract manufacturing sales will continue through -- largely through the first half of our fiscal. I think the cadence will be able to articulate a little bit better on our fourth quarter fall. But I think it probably makes sense to sort of work with $140 million and think about sort of the front half.

Peter Galbo
Analyst at Bank of America

Thanks, Tucker.

Operator

Thank you. Next question is coming from Tom Palmer from Citi. Your line is now live.

Thomas Palmer
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

Hi, good morning and thanks for the question. Maybe I just follow up quickly on the contract manufacturing that Peter asked on. So you've taken down your outlook for sales. I think one of the -- you talked on some limitations in terms of remitting [Phonetic] in stranded costs, whether contract manufacturing, sales are still going on, but you also haven't changed your earnings dilution this year, right, to $0.60.

So maybe just get an update, are you able to eliminate some of these stranded costs as you think about this year? Because I think last week, there was a little bit of a call out maybe as we look at the back half of the year, moving parts with the contract rolling off having the stranded cost lag. But again, seeing that this year, the accelerated roll-off, it hasn't really impacted that earnings dilution.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. Tom, maybe for awareness purposes, stranded overhead and contract manufacturing sales are independent. So first of all, speaking to contract manufacturing sales, the outlook for this fiscal year today is $140 million. It is essentially at no profit. Those sales will begin to go away halfway through next fiscal year. The removal or the elimination of contract manufacturing sales really does not address stranded overhead.

Stranded overhead outlook for this fiscal year is a net $0.60 impact. We had said since the time of divestiture, there would be an impact in FY '24 and in FY '25. To date, we've not outlined what the FY '25 impact is other than to note there will be an impact.

As you think about stranded overhead, really what is driving that and the predominance of what will need to be addressed is our network, largely driven by distribution. So as the post volume and/or product leaves our distribution environment, we need to right-size that in support of addressing stranded overhead among other activities that we've already identified and are beginning to address for the benefit of next fiscal year. And then ultimately, we believe by the time we step into FY '26, we should begin to have address stranded overhead and begin to get it behind us.

Thomas Palmer
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

Okay. Thanks for that detail. I wanted to maybe clarify some of the costs on Uncrustables. You mentioned the start-up costs for 4Q and kind of the full year start-up costs. I just wanted to clarify on that, how much the start-up costs were in 3Q as we think about kind of the progression into 4Q? And then secondarily, just a step-up in advertising, how significant that might be as we think about 3Q to 4Q? Thanks.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

So as we think about the Uncrustables venture, there's three areas where we see incremental costs. One is as we begin to bring the McCall facility online that becomes an overhead carrying cost. The second component is as we advance the building of McCall, there's a preproduction expenses that we've also have in our full year guidance. And then last is, we have turned on marketing and so there's incremental marketing. And a portion of the outlook for marketing, switching from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, is not only due to timing but you're also seeing the step-up associated of uncrustable support for the business or the portfolio.

Thomas Palmer
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

Okay. I just was hoping for any quantification, I guess, as we think about kind of the progression 3Q into 4Q, I understood maybe -- you guys aren't providing that.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Tom, we're certainly happy to follow up with you afterwards just to help you round out your model.

Thomas Palmer
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

Got it. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Your next question is coming from Chris Carey from Wells Fargo. Your line is now live.

Chris Carey
Analyst at Wells Fargo & Company

Good morning. I just wanted to drill down on the Coffee segment specifically. Can you just give a context on how you see brand performance from here across Bustelo and Dunkin' and Folgers. And also, how you see volume mix versus pricing just given step-up in competition, some pricing actions from some of your competitors. And so just any context on how we should be thinking about coffee evolution going forward on -- really on a ball mix or price, any comments on the brands?

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Sure, Chris. It's Mark. I'd say overall, we feel very good. Obviously, growth, we view will continue to be driven by Bustelo, Dunkin' and then K-Cups broadly across all brands. Our K-Cup performance in the category -- in the quarter, rather, was very good. We outpaced the category. We -- we gained just over 0.5 point of share in take-up, and that includes solid performance on Folgers. And then, of course, as we've launched liquid, some liquid executions and Dunkin' -- Dunkin' in the shelf-stable coffee aisle has already sort of captured that number two position in liquid coffee concentrate. And we're launching similar Bustelo executions in the same format that are coming here in the next -- by the end of the fiscal. And so we feel very good about our performance in coffee.

Folgers is a mature brand, but we're pleased with the performance there as we've continued to -- our share of voice. We're advertising on all of our brands. And so we have a very strong share of voice there. And so just feeling generally optimistic about the coffee category in total and recognizing that we need to continue to shift and start to own some of the liquid executions as we have, but that segment is going to continue to grow. K-Cups will continue to be a very important part of the segment. And our goal is to continue to move to where the consumer is headed as well.

Chris Carey
Analyst at Wells Fargo & Company

Okay. Thanks. And just want to follow up on the marketing expense in Q4. Obviously, understanding the shift in Q3 to Q4. Can you just perhaps give a little context around what areas of the portfolio will see the marketing step-up in Q4? And just in general, where you see the most potential to invest behind the portfolio from a marketing standpoint in kind of more of a medium-term perspective, understanding the comments that you made on Hostess last week. Thanks.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. It's -- Chris, it's Mark, again. It's pretty much across the board in marketing. I wouldn't say it really, it doesn't skew to one business or another. I think you can generally apply it, it spreads pretty evenly. I guess I would just remind the group as well that we are committed to continuing supporting our brands through marketing. We over time and depending on obviously pricing and relative pricing, we still strive to be in that 6% to 7%-ish percent of net sales. Obviously, it varies a little bit by category. But marketing is really key to our model, and it's important to maintain a reasonable level of spend to support the brands over time.

Operator

Thank you. Next question is coming from Robert Moskow from TD Cowen. Your line is alive.

Robert Moskow
Analyst at TD Cowen

Hi, thanks for question. Actually two. First, Mark, on Hostess. Those of us familiar with that company are used to seeing maybe like one big product innovation that kind of dominates the pipeline. And when I looked at some of the announcements for this calendar year anyway, it seems like more like a couple of little things. So I was hoping you could dive a little bit more into how you view the pipeline this year compared to past pipelines?

And then secondly, for Tucker on free cash flow, the guide is down $30 million. You mentioned a couple of things impacting it, one of which was cash taxes, which is, I think, a $40 million increase. Can you go through the puts and takes as to -- it looks like from the puts and takes, you might actually be even lower than that 30% guide, given the cash taxes. So what was offsetting it? Thanks.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Sure, Rob, it's Mark. I'll start on innovation. I think reading between the lines of your question, one of the things that you might have been referencing is cash bars [Phonetic], right? Because that was a pretty large innovation and really pleased with the performance on cash bars [Phonetic]. It hits on a lot of different consumer insights, if you will, in terms of what -- why consumers enjoy that product. I would also just point out that Hostess has been very successful in their innovation of doing iterative innovation. I mean some of that -- sometimes that's seasonal, sometimes that's variations on flavors, fillings, those types of things. That will continue, that needs to continue.

And as I've talked about, the complementary capabilities that the hostess team has, as well as our legacy team, we view, without giving too much away that there continue to be great opportunities for continued growth, innovation being a key driver of growth going forward. So we won't be unveiling anything just today but wanted to just make sure that we're focused on it, the pace of innovation, the cycle times of innovation are still very important and protecting that and fueling it will continue to be a focus for us.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Rob, with respect to your free cash flow question, you're correct, the outlook for the fiscal year is now $500 million. The change of $30 million is largely driven by the cash taxes, as you have noted, being partially offset by just a little bit stronger earnings and also a little bit more favorability coming across all working capital.

Robert Moskow
Analyst at TD Cowen

Okay. Maybe a follow-up, Mark, on Hostess. I think you fielded a question on Hostess' pricing. It is down in our tracking data. And then there's a couple of competitors that were also down, but then there's another competitor that's up a lot. Is -- can you give more like clarity on what Hostess' pricing strategy is for the last six months or so? And is it achieving its objectives?

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Rob, just generally, I think that as we look at any of our categories, we want to make sure that we're being thoughtful and prudent about pricing and that we're recovering our costs. And generally speaking, not over recovering. So at the end of the day, we have to be responsible to the consumer, obviously, to our shareholders and making sure that we're doing the right things for the business, where we feel that from a pricing perspective, right now, we're in a good place, that the price is -- the pricing is set where it needs to be. And we will continue to compete effectively with the other brands in the marketplace.

Robert Moskow
Analyst at TD Cowen

Very helpful. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Matt Smith from Stifel. Your line is now live.

Matthew Smith
Analyst at Stifel Nicolaus

Hi good morning. You've talked about investing more behind Hostess bringing that advertising and marketing closer to a high single digit as a percent of sales. And you're starting that increase, it sounds like in the fourth quarter. Should we think about the path towards your target level as a multiyear step-up? Or do you expect to exit next year closer to that targeted investment level?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

We do expect to step up over time, and so we may not be completed there in fiscal '25. It will be a journey.

Matthew Smith
Analyst at Stifel Nicolaus

Thank you. And a quick follow-up on the pet sales comment. You talked about growing in the fourth quarter, and I want to make sure, is that growth inclusive of the co-manufacturing sales? And I can leave it there. Thank you.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Correct. My comments around pet growth were inclusive of the co-manufacturing volume.

Operator

Thank you. Next question is coming from Alexia Howard from Bernstein. Your line is now live.

Alexia Howard
Analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein

Good morning, everyone.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Good morning.

Alexia Howard
Analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein

Can I ask -- there's been a lot of discussion about the marketing step-up. Can I ask where you're at on promotional activity? Are you anticipating certain parts of the business leaning into promotions more over the coming quarters? And if so, which parts of the business? And I'm wondering how the depth and breadth of promotional activity compares to pre-COVID at this point. Do you still have to get back to those levels? Or where are you in that transition?

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Alexia, it's Mark. I think we don't -- we're not seeing anything abnormal in promotional spend. We're generally back to pre-pandemic promotional levels across our categories, the categories and competition, in our view, is behaving normally and rationally. So, we don't see anything out of the ordinary from a promotional standpoint.

Alexia Howard
Analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein

Okay. Great. And then just touching on the state of the U.S. consumer, I think at the CAGNY conference last week, there were a number of companies that said things seem to be improving. U.S. consumer confidence seems to be in a reasonably good place. Are you seeing any sort of glimmers of light in terms of emerging from a rather challenging last calendar year as we move into 2024?

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

I would -- a couple of comments. I think the first is our categories have continued to perform very well in this environment. I mean you have this notion that within our categories, we play across the value spectrum. So we offer products that are -- the consumer views as more value, whether it's Folgers or traditional Milk-Bone dog biscuits are obviously more affordable. We've also seen some of our premium offerings continue to perform well. So I think the breadth of our offering has served us well. We have a relatively low incidence of private label competition, relatively lower than other categories in our -- what you have in our portfolio. So that's been helpful.

Even when you -- in areas where you have seen some consumers shifting a bit, what I would might highlight is natural meat and pet. So you see our pepperoni brand, maybe a little bit softer than it has in the past. That's indicative of the entire sort of soft and chewy pet snack category. So that's not just us, but I think it's across competition as well.

That said, brands like Milk-Bone that have -- that play across that value spectrum have actually been able to pick up the slack of where we have seen some maybe temporary softness in some of those other brands.

Alexia Howard
Analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein

Great. Thank you very much. I'll pass it on.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Steve Powers from Deutsche Bank. Your line is now live.

Steve Powers
Analyst at Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft

Hey, thanks. Hi, Mark. Hi, Tucker.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Good morning.

Steve Powers
Analyst at Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft

Good morning. So Tucker, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I do want to go back to the stranded overhead, the conversation you were having earlier, and just play it back to you. I think a lot of the confusion on this point comes from -- I think it was Slide 9 in your CAGNY deck when you gave a number of fiscal '25 considerations. The way that slide reads is that is it's a year-over-year impact, right? So all of the considerations on those slides are pluses and minuses relative to -- it seems to '24. Strand overhead is a negative. And it's confusing because as you said earlier, contract manufacturing and strand overheads are independent considerations. And while there should be strand overhead carryover from '24 before it's fully rationalized in '26 and beyond, I guess I'm struggling from what you said earlier to see how it is worse than '25 than in '24. So maybe you can just kind of -- maybe I'm misinterpreting either the slide or your comments earlier, but just talk through how to think about strand overhead specifically, if you could. Thank you.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. Absolutely, Steve. And we certainly appreciate that the group is looking for clarity on this. We're doing our best without providing an estimate for FY '25. But going back to this fiscal year, we have a net $0.60 impact to earnings per share as a result of stranded overhead. That net impact is total stranded overhead costs less by TSA income and reimbursement for services. So we will end our transition services agreement about midway through the fiscal year. So therefore, we will not be collecting the income associated with those services.

Secondly is, we receive reimbursement for utilization of Smucker infrastructure, such as our distribution environment and as a result of that, when ultimately post exits our distribution facilities, we won't be receiving reimbursement. So the company through our transformation office has begun to address stranded overhead this fiscal year for the benefit of next fiscal year, but there are certain activities that we can't address until the TSA is completed, until they exit our distribution facilities, and we can rationalize some of that network.

Steve, I hope that helps provide context just around the framework and the mechanics certainly appreciate you're not the only one asking. So hopefully, that additional color is helpful to you and others.

Steve Powers
Analyst at Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft

Yeah, it does. So I think that -- so let me just -- so it sounds like the plug is that when you talked earlier about contract manufacturing, being essentially a zero-margin activity. You weren't including in that all of the other income considerations that you just spelled out. Fair?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Contract manufacturing, considerations are independent of stranded overhead considerations, whether they be qualitative or quantitative.

Steve Powers
Analyst at Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft

Understood? Very clear. Thank you so much.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Absolutely. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Pamela Kaufman from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.

Pamela Kaufman
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Good morning. I'm sorry to ask this again, but just to clarify, Steve's question on stranded overhead. Do you expect the magnitude of stranded over cost -- stranded overhead costs to moderate next year relative to the $0.60 impact this year? So that effectively creates a tailwind to year-over-year earnings growth.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Pam, I would love to tell you the number or the direction for next fiscal year, but that would be inappropriate until we finish our planning process. So unfortunately, we'll have to do that on the fourth quarter earnings call. I'm sorry.

Pamela Kaufman
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Understood. And then separately, will there be any lingering impact from the uncrustable start-up costs that impact 2025. And then can you just give an update on the progress that the transformation office has made? What have they been focused on? And what cost savings opportunities have they identified?

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

As we ramp up uncrustables production in McCalla, we will continue to see an impact associated with carrying overhead and a level of preproduction expenses. We're still refining what that estimate will be. But the great thing about McCalla is it will be producing saleable sandwiches for the benefit of fiscal year '25. As you think about our transformation office, we continue to be very pleased with our initial year where we've stood up the office where we've created almost 10 active work streams and support of cost and productivity savings in support of realizing synergies associated with the Hostess acquisition and also in support of addressing stranded overhead associated with the divested pet food brands.

And the exciting thing is it's not only contributing dollars for reinvestment back into the business, but it's supporting our earnings and earnings growth and delivery, but it's also enabling new ways of working for our employees and cross-functional teams to really deliver great benefits to our company and organization.

Pamela Kaufman
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Thank you.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Rob Dickerson from Jefferies. Your line is now live.

Robert Dickerson
Analyst at Jefferies Financial Group

Great, thanks so much. I don't mean to -- I'm just kidding. I just want to ask you a kind of broader question on coffee. I guess, Mark, when we think historically the coffee business is always very strong. It's been a consistent performer, operating margin kind of most of the time, let's say, the majority of the time historically was coming in a little bit north of 30%. Totally understand at that point in time, input costs were a bit lower.

But now I look at the business and think, okay, well, Cafe Bustelo is clearly doing extremely well. Dunkin' is still strong with new innovation platform. Folgers still taking volume share as the largest brand. So it seems as if the business itself is in a good position, I mean, even on a relative basis across the category. You're investing a little bit in price, but still pass-through category.

I'm just trying to rightsize kind of like how you're thinking about that margin profile, but just even say broadly speaking over the next couple of years, vis-a-vis kind of volume and price, right? Because volume is strong and pricing comes through usually kind of in a pass-through business, I would think there would be some fixed cost leverage that would allow you to start to recover kind of back to that 30%-plus profile, or just not there yet. So just curious as to how you're thinking about that. Thanks.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

So Rob, as we think about the coffee momentum through the year, the business continues to perform across the portfolio, and we're very pleased with the brands and with the formats. To your point, we've seen coffee margins improve. As we have gone through the fiscal year, particularly as we have lapped larger cost baskets and gotten into more normalized cost baskets. And so, we continue to see the strength of the portfolio. I think we're focused on sort of the high 20s, as we've said in previous earnings calls in support of having healthy margins in the portfolio but also in support of reinvesting in the business for the health and strength of our brands. And also, as we think about our desired growth in liquid coffee.

And then furthermore, as we continue to think about the trajectory of coffee, we always assess the volatility in the green coffee market. And we also ensure that we're passing through pricing when appropriate and prudent, both on the upside and the downside of inflation or deflation. And then lastly is, the coffee margin profile will continue to be strong in the fourth quarter. But then as we think about our first quarter of any fiscal year, it tends to be our sort of softer margin quarter of the full fiscal year.

Robert Dickerson
Analyst at Jefferies Financial Group

Okay. Fair enough. And then if I could just ask a fairly simple kind of dumb down question. In the Frozen Handheld Spread segment, you've clearly outlined kind of the revenue bogey [Phonetic] per year over the next -- I mean, this year and then over the next two years. So for modeling purposes, right, it's easy enough to say, okay, well, let's take what they finish this year in the segment and add $100 million, right? That's uncrustable. It seems like you have decent visibility on that. Are there any other puts and takes in that segment that could potentially get that segment, let's say, higher than that incremental $100 million that you've already defined on Uncrustables and partially speaking to the innovation coming from Jeff and then I don't know if they're offsets on spreads. And that's all. Thanks a lot.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Rob, we continue to be very excited about the trajectory of the Uncrustables venture brand and/or portfolio. We're still on track to the $1 billion ambition by the end of FY '26, you have noted. We said directionally, on average that might be about $100 million per year. I think right now, that's where our focus is to ensure that we get to that ambition as we continue to build out traditional distribution channels and territories, along with new distribution channels as well. And so, I think that, that's probably the framework that I would use as you think about modeling the glide path of Uncrustables over the next several years.

Robert Dickerson
Analyst at Jefferies Financial Group

All right, great. Thanks so much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Max Gumport from BNP Paribas.

Max Gumport
Analyst at BNP Paribas

Hey, thanks for the question. First one is on coffee. So on volume mix, it looked like it came in a bit better than we might have expected based on tracked channel trends during the quarter. I was hoping you could unpack the mix impact versus volume, and then also what you were seeing in tracked channels versus non-tracked channels? And how are those factors informing your view on the fourth quarter. Thanks.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. So as we think about the third quarter performance on coffee, we saw nice momentum from a volume mix standpoint. Obviously, we had the deflationary impact as a result of taking pricing, continue to be very pleased with the momentum on Cafe Bustelo and Dunkin' along with our K-Cup portfolio. They all performed well in the quarter. Folgers also had a very strong quarter as well, but it was a little softer from a volume mix standpoint as we were lapping a key retailer activity in the prior quarter. And we continue to be very pleased with how we're considering the momentum into our fourth quarter as well.

Max Gumport
Analyst at BNP Paribas

Thanks. And then on circling back to a slide you put up at CAGNY last week. So you laid out two tailwinds and three headwinds for your top line. Three of those are not related to organic, two of them are. So continued brand momentum and inflationary pressures impacting consumers. Realize you're not giving guidance yet for FY '25. But as we think about those two factors, is there any reason to think one outweighs the other? I'm really just trying to get a sense for how that continued brand momentum could or could not be offsetting the inflationary pressures impacting consumers? Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Tucker H. Marshall
Chief Financial Officer at J. M. Smucker

Yeah. Max, we have really strengthened the portfolio over the last several years with investments across our key brands, along with reshaping the portfolio. And so we feel very confident in the ongoing growth of the uncrustables, frozen handheld, demonstrating category leadership and spreads, continuing to demonstrate at-home coffee leadership with the continued growth of the Cafe Bustelo, Dunkin' and K-Cup portfolios. And then thinking about our pet momentum, as we think about Milk-Bone and also Meow Mix and then also the contribution from the Hostess acquisition, but to your point, back on the core portfolio.

As it relates to just the impact of inflationary pressures associated with the consumers' purchasing behavior, we continue to monitor and assess and understand what that means to our core portfolio. But what we have seen over the last several quarters is continued growth across the portfolio and demonstrating volume growth. And our expectation is that we continue to demonstrate momentum.

Operator

Thank you. We reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over for any further or closing comments.

Mark T. Smucker
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer at J. M. Smucker

Thank you. Appreciate everyone joining the call this morning. It was actually great to see you all at CAGNY last week. And obviously, there, we were able to share our strategy more holistically and -- and why we are so confident about the journey we've been on and the future of this business. Obviously, we hope you recognize the strong momentum in the third quarter, another great quarter for us and none of that would have been possible that are awesome employees. So I just want to take a moment to acknowledge our great employees, again, welcome the Hostess folks and the brands to our portfolio and just remain optimistic for the future and hope you all have a great day.

Operator

[Operator Closing Remarks]

Corporate Executives
Analysts

Alpha Street Logo