Omnicom Group Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Skip to Questions & Answers
Operator

Good afternoon. My name is Audra and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Omnicom 4th-Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. All lines have been placed on-mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press the star key followed by the number-one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again.

At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Greg Lundberg, Investor Relations. Please go-ahead.

Greg Lundberg
Senior Vice President Investor Relations at Omnicom Group

Thank you for joining our 4th-quarter and full-year earnings call. With me today are John Ren, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Phil Angelastro, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer. On our website, omnicomgroup.com, you will find a press release and a presentation covering the information we'll review today. An archived webcast will be available when today's call concludes.

Before we start, I'd like to remind everyone to read the forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial and other information that we've included at the end of our investor presentation. Certain of the statements made today may constitute forward-looking statements. These represent our present expectations and relevant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are listed in our earnings materials and in our SEC filings, including our 2023 Form 10-K. During the course of today's call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP measures, and you can find the reconciliation of these to the nearest comparable GAAP measures in the presentation materials.

We will begin the call with an overview of our business from John, then Phil will review our financial results. After our prepared remarks, we will open the line for your questions.

I'll now hand the call over to John.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

Thank you for joining us today. I'm pleased to report our 4th-quarter and full-year 2024 results were very strong and we are well-positioned as we enter 2025. After I finish commenting on the quarter and the year, I'll provide you an update on the proposed acquisition of Interpublic. Organic growth was 5.2% for the quarter. This growth was driven by very strong performance in our three largest disciplines, media and advertising, precision marketing and public relations.

Our strong finish to the year resulted in our organic growth of 5.2% for the full-year, which exceeded the high-end of our guidance. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the 4th-quarter was 16.7%. For the full-year, adjusted EBITA margin was 15.5%, in-line with our target. Non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share for the quarter was $2.41, up 6.6% versus the 4th-quarter of 2023. In 2024, our cash-flow continued to be very strong. We generated almost $2 billion in free-cash flow and returned over $900 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

During the year, we continued to expand and deepen our capabilities with the acquisition of Flywheel and the formation of two new strategic practice areas, OmniCon Production and Omnicom advertising Group. Using our Omni operating platform, our teams across practice areas can connect these services, leveraging high fidelity datasets and custom AI tools to plan, create, target, optimize and attribute campaigns with a single workflow. We are the unrival leader in linking marketing to sales, allowing us to deliver measurable outcomes that drive substantial growth and ROI for our clients.

Our success year-after year also leads to our industry recognition. TBWA was recently named 2024 Global Agency of the Year. Convergence announced that Omnicon Media Group had the highest billing growth rate among global media groups in 2024. Wins like Amazon, Unilever and HP fueled over $7 billion in new business. Omnicom Media Group also ranked first-in client retention rate for the year. Additionally, Omnicom's Media Group achieved the highest rating in Forrest's 2024 Media Management services wave, specifically emphasizing the Group's transparent business practices.

Finally, for the second year in a row, Omnicom was named Holding Company of the Year by MediaPost. I'm very pleased with our strategic progress and the financial results in 2024. We enter 2025 in a very strong position. Given it's early in the year, we're exercising a level of caution on our outlook for 2025. As of now, we expect organic growth to be between 3.5% and 4.5% and adjusted EBITDA margins to be 10 basis-points higher than what we achieved in 2024. I want to express my gratitude to our people around the globe for helping us finish the year-on a high note. Your unwavering dedication to delivering exceptional work to our clients, places Omnicom illness agencies in an excellent position as we enter the new year.

Let me now shift to the proposed acquisition of IPG and our progress since the announcement on December 9th. While we are incredibly excited about the combination of the two organizations, I want to emphasize that Omnicom and IPG continue to operate as independent businesses until the transaction is finalized. Omnicom's solid foundation and organizational structure positions us to seamlessly integrate IPG into our group once the acquisition closes. Combined, our complementary cultures and businesses will create an unmatched suite of services and products for our clients, leading to significant revenue growth potential.

After closing, we expect diluted earnings per share accretion driven by strong revenues, expanding margins and a strong balance sheet. Our combined free-cash flow will also be substantial and we expect to increase our historical capital allocations for dividends, share buybacks as well as investments necessary to maintain our leading position in technology, data and AI, including the integration of Axiom, Omni and the Flywheel platform. For decades, Axiom has established itself as the gold standard for managing clients' first-party data in some of the most highly regulated industries.

Axiom's client contracts are multiyear ranging from four to six years. Its clients include seven of the top-10 retail banks, nine of the top-10 credit card issuers and three of the top-five pharmaceutical manufacturers and several automotive companies. Wendy's leading first-party data management capabilities are integrated with Omni and Flywheel Commerce Cloud, we will provide the most accurate identity solution and comprehensive understanding of consumer behaviors and transactions on the buy-side. This platform will drive the industry towards a higher standard of metrics, linking ad spend, sales and value-based outcomes.

Regarding synergies, we're confident in our ability to achieve the projected $750 million in run-rate cost-savings. Importantly, these cost synergies will not impact employees dedicated to servicing our clients and generating revenues. Instead, they will arise from streamlining the holding company, middle office and regional positions as well as from eliminating duplicative overhead, back-office and third-party expenses across our larger combined global footprint. The combined company will generate approximately 85% of its revenues from its top-10 markets with the remainder primarily distributed across an additional 40 markets worldwide.

After closing, we plan to continue to support IPG's advertising brands in the marketplace, while aligning them with the current operating structure of Omnicom Advertising Group. More specifically, in our top-10 global markets, agency brands will continue to be fully present in order to drive growth. The remaining markets will function under a single OAG leader who will manage the Agency brands at a local level and report to a regional OAG lead. Similarly, it is our intention that IPG's other advertising and marketing services businesses will be aligned within our respective practice areas. This will enable us to combine and expand our talent, equipping them with dedicated technology and data tools in a single practice area to optimally deliver services and products to our clients.

In assessing talent, we will adopt an approach focused on selecting the best individuals across the organizations, irrespective of their current affiliation. With unified practice area leadership teams at a global, regional and country-level, we will eliminate redundant roles, functions and back-office operations, which we expect will generate cost-savings exceeding $130 million. Our larger portfolio of clients and businesses will enable us to combine our efforts and leverage a more centralized technology and data platform, significantly improving capital efficiency across a larger enterprise.

Additionally, more resources will be available for future investments. We expect this will result in initial savings of approximately $25 million in administrative costs. The largest cost-savings will result from merging two publicly-traded companies. We will combine and streamline senior leadership and operation teams across finance, accounting, IT, legal, real-estate and HR. Additionally, we will eliminate duplicative G&A costs. We expect to cut approximately 40% of the company's combined corporate expenses, resulting in compensation savings of around $200 million and G&A savings of about $110 million.

Establishing a unified procurement organization to maximize benefits from third-party vendors in key areas such as IT software and infrastructure as well as duplicative third-party research and data is projected to save more than $150 million. Integrating our internal IT and shared service organizations will improve the way we deliver services to our employees and reinforce our infrastructure and platforms. We expect to realize synergies of approximately $70 million across these areas. Aligning our real-estate portfolios following the closing will yield approximately $65 million in savings, which amounts to less than 10% of the combined total rent and occupancy costs.

Not included in our synergy projections are the following three areas: revenue opportunities, near and offshoring and automation. We believe revenue growth opportunities are substantial from the combination. We will expand client opportunities on day-one by offering our combined client base a broader suite of products and services. For example, the capabilities of Flywheel, Axiom and our Precision marketing group will be available to a much broader set of clients. Additionally, the combined company will drive greater product and service innovation, creating new revenue streams.

Following the closing, we will continue leveraging our near and offshore global centers of excellence to improve service delivery and lower labor costs. In 2024, we established four state-of-the-art centers of excellence in India and expanded our nearshore operations in Latin-America. We quickly scaled-up teams for a flywheel after that acquisition and we are now ready to capitalize on a significantly larger opportunity with Interpublic.

Finally, Omnicom is making significant progress in utilizing automation by leveraging new processes, platforms and AI. We have a dedicated central team spearheading our automation and initiatives and expect to expand our efforts in this area following the closing of the acquisition. As a result, I'm quite comfortable with the $750 million in synergies targeted at the time of the announcement. We anticipate identifying even more savings once the companies are combined. Going-forward, we plan to provide regular updates on our progress towards this target.

Regarding our efforts to close the transaction, we are well into the shareholder approval and regulatory review process. Our proxy became effective last week and a shareholder vote to approve the transaction is set for March 18. We also initiated the process for antitrust approval in the US and we're pleased with the progress we're making. The planning for regulatory approval in 17 other jurisdictions is progressing well. While predicting the exact timing is challenging, we still anticipate the deal closing in the second-half of 2025.

In the coming months, we will provide further updates on our regulatory approvals. In the meantime, we're committed to maintaining our momentum. We are utilizing the time we have to plan for the integration and keeping it to a small centralized team. This will eliminate distractions for our people and ensure client-facing teams stay focused on their day-to-day roles.

Thank you for listening to our call, and I'll now turn it over to Phil.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Thanks, John. As you just heard, we had a strong quarter and our financial performance positions us well for a solid 2025. Let's begin with a review of our performance in the 4th-quarter, beginning with changes in our revenues on Slide 4. Organic growth in the quarter was strong at 5.2%. The impact on revenue from foreign currency translation decreased reported revenue by 0.6%. If rates stay where they are currently, we estimate the impact of foreign currency translation will reduce revenue by 2% to 2.5% for Q1 2025 and 2% for the full-year 2025.

The net impact of acquisition and disposition revenue on reported revenue was positive 1.8%. At this time, we expect the impact of acquisition and disposition revenue will be flat for both Q1 and the full-year 2025. For the full-year 2024, our organic revenue growth was 5.2%, slightly above our stated goal of achieving the higher-end of our target of between 4% to 5%. As John mentioned, our expected organic revenue growth in 2025 is a range of 3.5% to 4.5% based on current market conditions.

Let's turn to Slide 5 and review the Q4 organic revenue growth trends by discipline that are informing our annual outlook. During the quarter, media and advertising was up 7% and primarily reflected growth across our media business with growth in advertising in the low-single digits. Growth in this discipline was particularly strong in the United States, our largest market. Precision marketing growth of 9% was very strong and benefited from year-end project spend. Overall, this was led by double-digit growth in the US, partially offset by mixed performance in other geographies.

We expect solid growth in 2025. Public relations grew 10%, also led by double-digit growth in the US as a result of US election spend, which is partially offset by softer performance internationally. This brought annual growth to approximately 4%. We estimate that the benefit from election spend was approximately $25 million in Q4 and $50 million for the year. Experiential growth of 5% was solid, coming off good results from the Summer Olympics earlier this year, especially in Q2 and Q3 as well as Q1. We do not expect to see 2024 growth levels in '25, given it is not an Olympic year.

Execution and support was up 2%, reflecting continued good results in-field marketing, offset by declines in our merchandising business. Healthcare revenues were down 4%. We are close to lapping a significant client loss and recent wins should start contributing to improved performance during the second-half of 2025. Branding and retail commerce declined by 12%, resulting from reduced client spending in our branding agencies and lower performance in retail commerce, some of which reflects budget allocation where clients move spend to retail media.

Turning to organic revenue growth by geography on Slide 6. Our largest market, the US had organic growth of 10%, finishing off the year-on a strong note. Although several markets in Europe, the Middle-East and Asia-Pacific delivered strong growth. They were offset by negative performance in other markets within these regions. Our businesses in Latin-America delivered strong growth driven by media and advertising. Slide 7 is our revenue by industry sector for the quarter and year-to-date. Overall, our portfolio remained stable as well as diversified. The only notable shift is a two-point increase in consumer products for both the quarter and the year, driven by the flywheel acquisition.

Now let's turn to Slide 8 for a look at our expenses. In the quarter, salary-related service costs were flat with growth from our acquisition of Flywheel, offset by repositioning actions in the second-quarter and our ongoing efforts to nearshore, offshore and increase productivity. Third-party service costs grew in connection with the growth in our revenue, especially in disciplines that have a higher-level of these costs such as media, experiential and field marketing. Third-party incidental costs, which are out-of-pocket costs billed back to clients at our cost were up slightly.

Occupancy and other costs, which include office rent, other occupancy, technology and general office expenses, increased primarily due to the Flywheel acquisition. SG&A expenses decreased due to general cost management. Included in the fourth quarters of both years are approximately $14.5 million of acquisition-related costs for flywheel in 2023 and the IPG transaction in 2024. Please turn to Slide nine and look at our income statement in more detail. Operating expenses in the fourth quarters of both 2024 and 2023 reflect these acquisition costs related to IPG and flywheel, respectively. Removing them from both years, 4th-quarter non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA grew 6.6% and EBITDA margin was flat year-over-year at 16.7%.

For the full-year 2024, our adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.5% compared to 15.6% in 2023, in-line with our guidance for 2024 by balancing ongoing cost-savings initiatives with continued investments in technology platforms and tools for future growth as well as costs related to the integration of Flagwell. For the full-year 2025, on a standalone Omnicom basis, we expect adjusted EBITDA margin to improve by-10 basis-points as we continue to balance cost-savings initiatives with strategic investment opportunities that we believe will continue to drive strong future revenue and EBITDA growth.

Moving down the income statement, net interest expense in the 4th-quarter of 2024 increased by $11.3 million to $38.1 million. The change was driven by a $12.4 million increase in interest expense due to higher outstanding debt, primarily from the $600 million of Eurobonds we issued in Q1 2024 in connection with the Flagwell acquisition, offset by a $1.1 million increase in interest income due to higher average cash balances. Our income tax-rate of 26.4% in Q4 '24 was flat with the prior year. For the full-year 2025, we expect the rate to be between 26.5% and 27%.

Net income growth of 5.2%, coupled with fewer diluted shares outstanding from our share repurchase activity drove a 6.1% lift in diluted earnings per share. On an adjusted basis, excluding after-tax amortization, Q4 2024 diluted earnings per share was up 6.6% to $2.41. Note that the negative impact of foreign-exchange translation resulted in a reduction of $0.02 per share also on an adjusted basis for Q4 and $0.05 per share for the full-year.

Now please turn to Slide 10 for a look at free-cash flow. For the year, our free-cash flow grew 4.2%, driven primarily by improved operating income and net income. Our free-cash flow definition, like other peers, excludes changes in working capital. For full-year 2024, our working capital improved once again by 50% to a use of $231 million, as you can see on Slide 18. We expect our strong performance will continue and bring us back over-time toward our historically neutral annual level.

Regarding our primary uses of free-cash flow for full-year 2024, we used $553 million of cash to pay for dividends to common shareholders and another $85 million for dividends to non-controlling interest shareholders, both roughly the same level as 2023. Our capital expenditures were $141 million. Levels were higher in 2024, reflecting ongoing investments in flywheel, our strategic technology platform initiatives and investments in our facilities. Total acquisition payments, which include earn-out payments and the acquisition of additional non-controlling interests were $998 million, which primarily reflects the acquisition at the beginning of the year of flywheel for $845 million, net of cash acquired and the late September acquisition of Leappoint.

Finally, our share repurchase activity was $371 million, excluding proceeds from stock plans of $102 million, which is in-line with our expectation that repurchases will be lower than our recent historical average of approximately $600 million due to the Flywheel acquisition. For full-year 2025, we expect to return to the $600 million repurchase level. Slide 11 is a summary of our credit, liquidity and debt maturities. At the end of 2024, book-value of our of our outstanding debt was $6 billion, up from the end of 2023. Changes during the year included the issuance of $600 million, 3.7% euro notes related to the Flywheel acquisition as well as the issuance of $600 million, 5.3% US dollar notes, which was used for most of the repayment of our $750 million, 3.65% US dollar notes in November.

Looking-forward, we have no maturities in 2025 and expect to address our April 2026 maturities after the expected closing of the IPG acquisition in the second-half of 2025. We estimate net interest expense to increase in Q1 of 2025 by approximately $7 million, reflecting the full-quarter impact of the notes we issued in February of 2024 and an expected increase in pension-related interest expense.

We also estimate that net interest expense will increase by $15 million to $20 million for the full-year, primarily related to lower estimates of interest income beyond Q1. Cash equivalents and short-term investments at September 30 were $4.3 billion, in-line with levels at the end of 2023. We continue to maintain an undrawn $2.5 billion revolving credit facility, which backstops our $2 billion US commercial paper program. We will assess our revolver capacity in connection with the closing of the proposed IPG acquisition.

Slide 12 presents our historical returns on two important performance metrics for the 12 months ended, 31 December 2024. Omnicom's return on invested capital was 25%. Our return-on-equity was 38%, both of which consistently reflect our strong performance and strong balance sheet. Slide 13 is a summary of the potential IPG acquisition, which highlights what we believe are the very compelling merits of the transaction. As John discussed, we believe the combination will drive exceptional future growth opportunities. In closing, 2024 was a very solid year for.

We delivered organic revenue growth of 5.2%, adjusted EBITDA growth of 6.1% and adjusted EPS growth of 5.5%. We made important investments in our platforms while maintaining our strong adjusted EBITDA margin level. Our free-cash flow grew by over 4% and we significantly reduced our use of operating capital. We executed two key financings, closed on strategic acquisitions and announced the transformative acquisition of IPG.

I will now ask the operator to please open up the lines for questions-and-answers. Thank you.

Skip to Participants
Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. If you have dialed-in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your questions, simply press star one again. And we'll take our first question from Adam Berlin at UBS.

Adam Berlin
Analyst at UBS Group

Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking two questions if I could. The first question is, 2024 organic growth ended-up above the top-end of your guidance range. Can you talk a little bit about what happened in Q4 that meant things ended-up better than you expected? Was it just more ad spend clients investing more or was it around precision marketing? Just what beat your expectations in Q4 question?

And the second question is, I'm a little bit surprised that you've guided for a slowdown in organic growth in 2025 and given the strong account wins you've had both during 2024 and a couple of things announced at the beginning of 2025. Can you just explain your thinking about why you think growth is going to slow-down and are you just being a bit conservative because it's the beginning of the year? Thanks.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

Thanks. Do you want to take the first one?

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Yeah, I'll take the first one. Adam. Yeah, I think we certainly expected to finish at the top-end of the range 5% versus 5% isn't -- isn't really that significant of a difference in the scheme of things. But certainly, the media business and precision marketing performed quite well in the 4th-quarter as well as the PR practice group as it related to the US election, some of that spend in the 4th-quarter. Those are probably the key drivers of, you know, people or businesses coming in a little bit higher than we expected from a positive perspective in the 4th-quarter. So I think those are the key drivers.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

All right. And Adam, with respect to the guidance, I think I -- in my prepared remarks, when I talk about it, I indicate that we're cautious. '25 is going to prove to be a very interesting year, but with all the changes in the US government, just a mere change plus some of the policies that they're considering and the implications they possibly have on things like the auto sector and other sectors. We're not pessimistic. We still remain optimistic but I think we're going to be conservative at this point in the year until we get a little bit further along and a bit more guidance from our clients.

Adam Berlin
Analyst at UBS Group

Thanks. Very clear.

Operator

We'll move next to David Karnowski at JPMorgan.

David Karnovsky
Analyst at J.P. Morgan

Hey, thank you. John, just following-up on the merger. Can you discuss a bit what's been the reaction so-far from clients? What are the points of excitement versus reservation and how are you addressing any possible concerns?

And then for Phil on the margins, the guide through most of '24 was for more or less flat. So your result was in that target, but wanted to see if you could review what factors pushed that on-balance to the slightly negative side, including flywheel, new business or investments? And then as we look to '25, can you just walk-through the puts and takes of that margin moving up 10 basis-points in the guide? Thanks.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure. In terms of clients, every client that I've been in contact with and most of my principals who lead other businesses have been very constructive and see the possibilities coming out-of-the combination of both Omnicom and in public. There seem -- I haven't heard any concerns that we weren't able to address. There are -- as I said in my statements, we still do have to operate as two independent companies. So we still operate as two independent companies until we get through the regulatory period, but we're able to plan and start to identify products and services that one of us have that we can offer to a larger bench on behalf of the other and vice-versa.

We've also spent time -- we'll spend a little bit more time later this month with consultants involved in advising clients in terms of reviewing their business, either positively, constructively or putting the business in pitch. And we've gotten a very favorable feedback from those folks and we will continue to communicate to everyone on a regular basis as we go through this process. We do feel that we've made very good progress, especially since we announced right before the holidays and we had to work-through the holidays to get some of the regulatory filings done in the US and some things done.

So clients we haven't heard any concerns and we don't anticipate concerns because of what's in the each of our portfolios to date and we want to keep the -- consultants informed because oftentimes they're the first people that clients reach-out to if they are considering making a change. So they have a pretty clear understanding of what to look-forward to. So we're bullish and we remain bullish on the transaction and some of the heavy-lifting from a regulatory point-of-view is really bad for us let's talk about.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

In our updates throughout the year, we indicated we were going through a process of integrating flywheel. Margins were down probably 10 basis-points or so in the first-quarter last year. And I think we're always trying to find the right balance of investing to support long-term sustainable growth and at the same time, maximizing our EBIT growth and the margin falls out. Certainly, we got to flat margin in Q4 as we anticipated and expected.

And I think as we look out at 2025, certainly, our goal is to show some margin improvement, while at the same time balancing those investments that we talked about in the prepared remarks and have talked about on all of our calls. Yeah, the marketplace continues to change pretty rapidly, rapidly and we continue to invest in the businesses that we think are going to drive our growth in a sustainable way into the future and we do try to manage that balance all throughout our planning processes and our execution processes.

So we expect to continue with our efficiency efforts, automation offshore, et-cetera, to drive but drive the cost structure down as best we can and be as efficient as we can so that we can continue to invest and provide that base for sustainable long-term growth. So I think I think we're comfortable with the expectations right now for 2025 and you know, we're going to we're going to continue to drive the business forward.

Operator

Next, we'll go to Tim Nolan at Macquarie.

Tim Nollen
Analyst at Macquarie Capital

Thanks. A couple of integration questions, if I could. You've referenced flywheel a couple of times already. Just wanted to check on where the status of the integration of that is now basically little more than a year in. And likewise on IPG, my question is, you've done quite a bit of work to consolidate. I don't know if that's the right word to use, but to concentrate your activities with Omnicom advertising Group and the production platform and so forth. I'm just wondering how IPG fits into that sort of pre-existing concentrated Omnicom.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure. Let me do the last part of that question first. What I said in my prepared remarks is really the reality between the two groups. If you look at 85% of our revenue is both Omnicoms and IPGs are generated in the top-10 markets. When putting aside the integration for a second, at Omnicom last year, what we did was we kept the brands alive in those top markets and we took a hard look at the other 35 to 40 markets we operate in and said what's the best way to efficiently run these offices, both to the satisfaction of the clients, the people themselves working in those offices and create as many career opportunities as possible.

And as a result, we came up with OAG. And OAG allowed us to take overheads and inefficiencies and set realistic expectations based upon the market as to what the growth in those markets should be. And we are planning to follow a similar process here with when and if we're successful in completing the transaction with public. The major markets where -- where everybody is constantly focused and should be because they're the places that generate the greatest growth will be left and supported effectively in the way that they are.

When we get those other 40 markets we're going to take a look and say what is the best way to organize that individual market. For Omnicom so-far, it's been to set-up OAG. We think although we haven't done the work yet, we think that when we sit-down and speak to the people at public, which will be permitted as we get further and further through this regulatory period, we're going to find the same result when we do that planning.

So in my comments, I was pointing to our intention at this point based upon the knowledge that we have. And as long as that knowledge works out, we'll follow the same pattern. If we find something that will con -- have to be treated differently because it contributes to our ongoing growth, we will treat that differently. So I don't know if that helps out, Tim or if that answers your question or not.

Tim Nollen
Analyst at Macquarie Capital

Yes. No, that's very helpful. Thanks, John. And on flywheel?

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

And flywheels integrate done. Flywheels team is very much a part of the central team with pitch businesses. In my prepared remarks, I probably took out a paragraph because I thought I was carrying on a little long about the mutual wins that we had during the year and there were numerous.

Tim Nollen
Analyst at Macquarie Capital

Great. Thanks very much, John.

Operator

We'll move next to Cameron McVeigh at Morgan Stanley.

Cameron McVeigh
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Thanks. I was hoping you could talk a little bit about the campaign management tools coming out-of-the big tech platforms, notably Performance Max or Advantage Plus from Google and Meta. Curious if they're impacting client share or growth rates at all or maybe these platforms are targeting SMBs and the market which aren't historically clients. Any color on how you're thinking about that would be helpful. Thank you.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

I think most of the impact, if there is any impact going on at present, it's really with the SMBs and not our normal client base. Having said that, we have a very robust program going on with several 1,000 of our creative and strategists who are testing all large language models because a different large language model may be more applicable for a certain task or a certain outcome depending upon what the person is asked to do.

So we have a very active program going on where we're seeing what we're doing it in a way that our people can utilize those tools the best way they see fit-in the most appropriate way they see fit and one that is compliant in our understanding of the regulations, both privacy plus copyright and all sorts of other concerns, which are -- if you're not a small-business unit, you don't have to place as much concern about as you would if you were a large multinational corporation, which tends to be what our clients are. So, but we're very active with it and it's being actively used and tested every day.

I -- prior to this call, I had Jeff Goodby in my office who has 40 people in his agency in San Francisco working on it and he was asking if he could expand the number of people who have access to the system and that was literally less than 45 minutes ago, which we gave him permission to do. So use is growing every day and we're -- and there's a new tool or capability that's appearing every day. We -- you just saw it in this past week or so with the Chinese introduction of their large language model. So we're in a very, very early-stage of development, but a very impactful stage of development as we move into the future.

Cameron McVeigh
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Thanks, John. That's helpful. And then just secondly, I did notice a number of partnership announcements out of CES. Curious if you could dive a little further into those, particularly with Google, Amazon, TikTok, maybe what that means for Omni's capabilities going-forward.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

You know I prepared for everything, but and I was there at CS, I know that I read them all ahead of time. I didn't focus on anything for this call.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

We can certainly pick it up cam when we talk post call if you'd like.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

That's a constant one thing I will add it's a -- it's a wonderful relationship with all those major players and we're constantly working with them and getting access to what we feel are the best, most appropriate tools. But Phil and company will give you more specifics.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Yeah. I mean, the primary focus of some incremental benefits is access to some of the data that is very unique to their platforms that we'll be able to access and use for the benefit of our clients. So our media people and our media teams are certainly very excited about it and it is kind of a unique thing across each of those platforms in terms of the partnerships that were recently-announced.

Cameron McVeigh
Analyst at Morgan Stanley

Got it. Thank you.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure.

Operator

Next, we'll move to Jason at Citigroup.

Jason Bazinet
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

I just had a question on share buybacks. I think you guys talked about potentially not buying back a lot of stock in the 4th-quarter. But I think that was that was sort of before the transaction closed and maybe our transaction was announced on December 9th, maybe you're in a blackout period or something. But do you mind just talking a bit about your sort of posture as it relates to buying back stock given -- given that your shares are down a fair amount since the IPG announcement was made sure. Thanks.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure. We certainly intend and I've indicated in our prepared remarks that we will be back-in the market in terms of buying back shares in 2025. We did reduce the annual buyback amount in '24, primarily because in January, right the start of the year, we did the flywheel acquisition, we did a financing associated with that and we indicated on the February call that we were going to reduce the amount that we bought back-in calendar '24 in terms of the use of our free-cash flow.

At that time. And in fact, we said we'd probably buy-back about half of the annual amount. We ended-up buying back a little bit more than that before the end of 2024. We certainly expect to get back to the $600 million level in 2025 and we are going to have to navigate one or two blackout periods associated with the transaction. But certainly, you know, we have a strategy in-place to be able to buy-back shares at least to that $600 million level and expect to do so during the calendar year 2025. So I think you should expect a more normalized approach in '25. It may be a little bit different in terms of the timing because of the transaction and the regulatory process, but certainly that's our expectation.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

The only thing I'd add is rest assured that I think I'm the largest single shareholder. So I'm as interested in these things, maybe a little bit more than the average listener. So we totally agree with you. We haven't changed our approach.

Jason Bazinet
Analyst at Smith Barney Citigroup

Okay. Thank you very much.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure.

Operator

And we'll go next to Craig Huber at Huber Research.

Craig Huber
Analyst at Huber Research Partners

Yes, hi, good afternoon. John, can you talk a little bit further about revenue synergies with the IPG transaction once it closes here, I mean, have been known you guys for a number of years. It seems like you would haven't done this just for the $750 million of cost-savings, which you seem pretty constructive on that front. But talk a little bit more about the revenue synergies other than just Axi and flywheel, where else do you think you guys can drive some revenue synergies? And is there an idea in your head about where you're thinking what it could maybe add-up to? I mean maybe add a couple of hundred basis-points to growth in the first year versus second year? Thank you.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

I am confident that there's quite a bit of revenue upside. I have to start with media. We have a very elaborate and very mature principal media business to start-off with. If you just referenced prior conference calls that Filipe has been on, he's indicated that they were trailing behind the competition and the implementation of that and that they were in the process of perfecting their program. Us coming together will make that available to their suite of clients in addition to our growing suite of clients. So that's number-one.

Number two, there really are two companies that stand-out as having unique credibility as first first-party data companies. One is Epsilon, the other is Axiom. I think that my competitor has done a very good job of creating some products based upon the information and the data that Epsilon generates and creates. We've had conversations to the extent that our lawyers will permit it with the Axiom group and we see a whole suite of incremental products that will be brought into the joint company and made available for the first time to Omnicom's clients. And so we see very reasonable revenue growth associated with that.

On the back of that, what's going on and it will go on during the regulatory period through '25 and take -- have more-and-more of an impact every month as we go-forward. These investments we're making in AI and some of the large language models that are occurring will make us more efficient, will make the product and the efforts that we're engaged with on behalf of clients more efficient and as we get more efficient we're getting more measurable and any media, any dollar spent that is more measurable and does get a definable ROI for a client, I've never seen a client where we've been able to present those facts and not double down and spend growing their business because that's what their aim is.

So there's two things going on. This will allow us to be to pick-up tools and activities that otherwise we didn't have in our portfolio and utilize them in a unique way, number-one. And number two, it will allow us to advance and spend more resources generated from our free-cash flow of the combined businesses on this technology, its development and how we're going to deploy it to the benefit of our people and also for our clients.

Craig Huber
Analyst at Huber Research Partners

Great. Thank you, John.

Operator

We'll take our final question from Stephen Cahall at Wells Fargo.

Steven Cahall
Analyst at Wells Fargo Securities

Thank. John, maybe first, just a follow-up on these same themes. You've talked a lot about the revenue acceleration on the combination with IPG and you said you're able to now do some planning together. When are you able to start to go into pitches together? I think one of the best ways to prove to the market that this merger is offensive and not defensive is showing that revenue acceleration. So I'm wondering at what point you'll be able to put that combined capability in front of clients and start to convert that into business?

And then Phil, we've always looked at IPG on a net organic revenue growth basis and you talked about some of the drivers in third-party costs in the quarter. Is there any way to think about Omnicom from a net organic revenue basis at the moment, so we can put those kind of apples-to-apples. Thank you.

John D. Wren
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Omnicom Group

Yeah. Hey, Steve, if you could see me, you'd see that I have a lawyer on my right shoulder and he hasn't left me since December 9th. And what he points out to me is the rules of engagement and especially during the regulatory period. And there are pretty -- they're not pretty, there are defined rules as to how the companies have to operate until we get the approvals that we need to combine. As a result, we cannot go and pitch some of these opportunities together, which would be the natural thing to do. I have examples of a couple of clients that we actually share. And the only time that you will find an Omnicom public person in the same room is if the client insist on the meeting because we're not permitted to get there yet. But that's the negative side of it.

The positive side of it is we're able to test and identify these products and identify the clients, be there us identifying through our client portfolio or them identifying through theirs, the clients that would be open to and would be excited about understanding these products and how they would positively impact their businesses. So it is a bit of a temporary you know pause because we're required to, but we're not wasting that time, we're utilizing that time to plan how we're going to deploy these as quick as humanly possible when we get permission from the regulatory authority to do so.

I'll leave the second question to Phil.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Yeah, regarding -- regarding the concept of net versus revenue as we're required to report. Yeah, I think the bottom-line is no different for us., those costs, the third-party service costs are an integral part of the business. We manage them as such, and we don't exclude them from how we manage and measure our performance so I wouldn't expect that to change and certainly you know, if people want to make their own estimates, but they can feel free-to do so. But you know, we're going to be consistent with our reporting and we're going to include the cost that are part of the business and we're going to manage them because costs that are part of the business. So I don't think the expectation is that we're going to change our approach in the near-future.

Steven Cahall
Analyst at Wells Fargo Securities

Thank you.

Philip J. Angelastro
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Omnicom Group

Sure.

Operator

And that concludes the question-and-answer session. Thank you for your participation in today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Corporate Executives
  • Greg Lundberg
    Senior Vice President Investor Relations
  • John D. Wren
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  • Philip J. Angelastro
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Analysts

Alpha Street Logo

Transcript Sections