AB Dynamics (ABDP) Competitors

TI Fluid Systems (LON:TIFS) and AB Dynamics (LON:ABDP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, community ranking, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Does the media favor TIFS or ABDP?

In the previous week, TI Fluid Systems had 4 more articles in the media than AB Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TI Fluid Systems and 2 mentions for AB Dynamics. AB Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat TI Fluid Systems' score of 0.55 indicating that AB Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TI Fluid Systems	1 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AB Dynamics	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TIFS or ABDP?

TI Fluid Systems has higher revenue and earnings than AB Dynamics. TI Fluid Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AB Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TI Fluid Systems	£3.47B	0.28	£90.40M	£0.15	1,289.33
AB Dynamics	£104.41M	4.26	£13.71M	£0.59	3,288.14

Which has more risk & volatility, TIFS or ABDP?

TI Fluid Systems has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AB Dynamics has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Is TIFS or ABDP a better dividend stock?

TI Fluid Systems pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. AB Dynamics pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. TI Fluid Systems pays out 4,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. AB Dynamics pays out 1,186.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TIFS or ABDP?

75.0% of TI Fluid Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of AB Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.6% of TI Fluid Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of AB Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in TIFS or ABDP?

AB Dynamics received 31 more outperform votes than TI Fluid Systems when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 68.27% of users gave AB Dynamics an outperform vote while only 67.15% of users gave TI Fluid Systems an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
TI Fluid Systems	Outperform Votes 139 67.15%	Underperform Votes 68 32.85%
AB Dynamics	Outperform Votes 170 68.27%	Underperform Votes 79 31.73%

Is TIFS or ABDP more profitable?

AB Dynamics has a net margin of 13.13% compared to TI Fluid Systems' net margin of 2.61%. TI Fluid Systems' return on equity of 13.64% beat AB Dynamics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TI Fluid Systems	2.61%	13.64%	4.41%
AB Dynamics	13.13%	11.28%	3.80%

Do analysts prefer TIFS or ABDP?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TI Fluid Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
AB Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

AB Dynamics beats TI Fluid Systems on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.