AFC vs. XPP, CWR, LUCE, SUP, IKA, DWHA, DWHT, DIA, GELN, and EAAS
Should you be buying AFC Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of AFC Energy include XP Power (XPP), Ceres Power (CWR), Luceco (LUCE), Supreme (SUP), Ilika (IKA), Dewhurst Group (DWHA), Dewhurst Group (DWHT), Dialight (DIA), Gelion (GELN), and eEnergy Group (EAAS). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.
AFC Energy vs.
XP Power (LON:XPP) and AFC Energy (LON:AFC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, community ranking, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.
XP Power has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. XP Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AFC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, AFC Energy had 1 more articles in the media than XP Power. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for AFC Energy and 0 mentions for XP Power. AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat XP Power's score of 0.00 indicating that AFC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
XP Power currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,665, indicating a potential upside of 42.24%. AFC Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 4,000, indicating a potential upside of 46,903.53%. Given AFC Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AFC Energy is more favorable than XP Power.
XP Power has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AFC Energy has a beta of 2.96, meaning that its stock price is 196% more volatile than the S&P 500.
66.1% of XP Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of XP Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
XP Power received 103 more outperform votes than AFC Energy when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 74.86% of users gave XP Power an outperform vote while only 64.68% of users gave AFC Energy an outperform vote.
XP Power has a net margin of -5.19% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,502.53%. XP Power's return on equity of -9.45% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.
Summary
XP Power beats AFC Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get AFC Energy News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
AFC Energy Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:AFC) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
