CIC vs. HKLD, DAR, INL, OHG, TRAF, ASPL, HWG, SERE, PCA, and AEWL
Should you be buying Conygar Investment stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Conygar Investment include Hongkong Land (HKLD), Dar Global (DAR), Inland Homes (INL), One Heritage Group (OHG), Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), Aseana Properties (ASPL), Harworth Group (HWG), Schroder European Real Estate Investment Trust (SERE), Palace Capital (PCA), and AEW UK Long Lease REIT (AEWL). These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.
Conygar Investment vs.
Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, community ranking, earnings and institutional ownership.
Hongkong Land has a net margin of -31.57% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -632.25%. Hongkong Land's return on equity of -1.77% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.
Hongkong Land pays an annual dividend of GBX 22 per share. Conygar Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Hongkong Land pays out -8,461.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conygar Investment pays out -3.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
In the previous week, Hongkong Land had 1 more articles in the media than Conygar Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hongkong Land and 0 mentions for Conygar Investment. Hongkong Land's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conygar Investment'saverage media sentiment score.
Conygar Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hongkong Land. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hongkong Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500.
13.0% of Hongkong Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 53.4% of Hongkong Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Conygar Investment received 214 more outperform votes than Hongkong Land when rated by MarketBeat users.
Summary
Hongkong Land beats Conygar Investment on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Conygar Investment News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Conygar Investment Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:CIC) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff