GLB vs. CWK, TATE, PFD, BAKK, DCG, GNC, HFG, ZAM, BD15, and BMK
Should you be buying Glanbia stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Glanbia include Cranswick (CWK), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Premier Foods (PFD), Bakkavor Group (BAKK), Dairy Crest Group (DCG), Greencore Group (GNC), Hilton Food Group (HFG), Zambeef Products (ZAM), Tate & Lyle (BD15), and Benchmark (BMK). These companies are all part of the "packaged foods" industry.
Glanbia vs.
Cranswick (LON:CWK) and Glanbia (LON:GLB) are both mid-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, community ranking, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.
In the previous week, Cranswick had 4 more articles in the media than Glanbia. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Cranswick and 1 mentions for Glanbia. Glanbia's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Cranswick's score of -0.01 indicating that Glanbia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Cranswick presently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,156, suggesting a potential upside of 5.55%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Glanbia.
84.6% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Glanbia shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Cranswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Glanbia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Glanbia pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share and has a dividend yield of 357.8%. Cranswick pays out 42.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Glanbia pays out 7,340.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than Cranswick. Glanbia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Cranswick received 326 more outperform votes than Glanbia when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 65.00% of users gave Glanbia an outperform vote while only 63.62% of users gave Cranswick an outperform vote.
Glanbia has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 4.35%. Cranswick's return on equity of 12.64% beat Glanbia's return on equity.
Cranswick has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Glanbia has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Cranswick beats Glanbia on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Glanbia News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:GLB) was last updated on 3/26/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
