KEYS vs. RWS, JSG, DWF, RST, FRAN, CPI, DLAR, BEG, KGH, and SFT
Should you be buying Keystone Law Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Keystone Law Group include RWS (RWS), Johnson Service Group (JSG), DWF Group (DWF), Restore (RST), Franchise Brands (FRAN), Capita (CPI), De La Rue (DLAR), Begbies Traynor Group (BEG), Knights Group (KGH), and Software Circle (SFT). These companies are all part of the "specialty business services" industry.
Keystone Law Group vs.
Keystone Law Group (LON:KEYS) and RWS (LON:RWS) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.
Keystone Law Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. RWS pays an annual dividend of GBX 12 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Keystone Law Group pays out 7,916.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. RWS pays out -13,333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RWS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
RWS has a consensus target price of GBX 330, suggesting a potential upside of 108.60%. Given RWS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RWS is more favorable than Keystone Law Group.
Keystone Law Group has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RWS has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Keystone Law Group has a net margin of 8.52% compared to RWS's net margin of -5.22%. Keystone Law Group's return on equity of 43.76% beat RWS's return on equity.
RWS received 172 more outperform votes than Keystone Law Group when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 71.63% of users gave RWS an outperform vote while only 70.00% of users gave Keystone Law Group an outperform vote.
Keystone Law Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RWS. RWS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keystone Law Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
43.3% of Keystone Law Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.3% of RWS shares are held by institutional investors. 43.1% of Keystone Law Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.2% of RWS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, RWS had 1 more articles in the media than Keystone Law Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RWS and 1 mentions for Keystone Law Group. RWS's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Keystone Law Group's score of -0.99 indicating that RWS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
RWS beats Keystone Law Group on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Keystone Law Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KEYS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Keystone Law Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:KEYS) was last updated on 1/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff