MAFL vs. LFI, TEK, BFSP, DVNO, TPVE, YOLO, FFWD, PMGR, JTWO, and VEN2
Should you be buying Mineral & Financial Investments stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Mineral & Financial Investments include London Finance & Investment Group (LFI), Tekcapital (TEK), Blackfinch Spring VCT (BFSP), Develop North (DVNO), Triple Point Income VCT Plc E (TPVE), Yolo Leisure and Technology (YOLO), Fastforward Innovations (FFWD), Premier Miton Glb Renewables Trust (PMGR), J2 Acquisition (JTWO), and Ventus 2 VCT (VEN2). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Mineral & Financial Investments vs.
Mineral & Financial Investments (LON:MAFL) and London Finance & Investment Group (LON:LFI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and community ranking.
Mineral & Financial Investments has higher revenue and earnings than London Finance & Investment Group. Mineral & Financial Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than London Finance & Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Mineral & Financial Investments has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, London Finance & Investment Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Mineral & Financial Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat London Finance & Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mineral & Financial Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.
0.1% of London Finance & Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 44.7% of Mineral & Financial Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of London Finance & Investment Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Mineral & Financial Investments has a net margin of 62.87% compared to London Finance & Investment Group's net margin of 50.77%. Mineral & Financial Investments' return on equity of 15.75% beat London Finance & Investment Group's return on equity.
Mineral & Financial Investments received 69 more outperform votes than London Finance & Investment Group when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 62.01% of users gave Mineral & Financial Investments an outperform vote while only 61.76% of users gave London Finance & Investment Group an outperform vote.
Summary
Mineral & Financial Investments beats London Finance & Investment Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Mineral & Financial Investments News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAFL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Mineral & Financial Investments Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:MAFL) was last updated on 1/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff