Mobile Streams (MOS) Competitors

Fulham Shore (LON:FUL) and Mobile Streams (LON:MOS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, community ranking, media sentiment and dividends.

Does the media favor FUL or MOS?

In the previous week, Mobile Streams had 3 more articles in the media than Fulham Shore. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Mobile Streams and 2 mentions for Fulham Shore. Mobile Streams' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Fulham Shore's score of -0.23 indicating that Mobile Streams is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fulham Shore	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Mobile Streams	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in FUL or MOS?

Fulham Shore received 6 more outperform votes than Mobile Streams when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 69.54% of users gave Fulham Shore an outperform vote while only 53.49% of users gave Mobile Streams an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Fulham Shore	Outperform Votes 121 69.54%	Underperform Votes 53 30.46%
Mobile Streams	Outperform Votes 115 53.49%	Underperform Votes 100 46.51%

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FUL or MOS?

25.4% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.1% of Fulham Shore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.8% of Mobile Streams shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has more volatility & risk, FUL or MOS?

Fulham Shore has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mobile Streams has a beta of -0.4, suggesting that its share price is 140% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate FUL or MOS?

Given Fulham Shore's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fulham Shore is more favorable than Mobile Streams.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fulham Shore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A
Mobile Streams	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FUL or MOS?

Fulham Shore has higher revenue and earnings than Mobile Streams.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fulham Shore	£93.13M	0.00	£1.52M	N/A	N/A
Mobile Streams	£1.82M	13.21	-£2.85M	N/A	N/A

Is FUL or MOS more profitable?

Fulham Shore has a net margin of 1.63% compared to Mobile Streams' net margin of 0.00%. Fulham Shore's return on equity of 3.91% beat Mobile Streams' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fulham Shore	1.63%	3.91%	1.17%
Mobile Streams	N/A	-165.33%	-58.95%

Summary

Fulham Shore beats Mobile Streams on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.