RM (RM) Competitors

DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, community ranking, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Which has better earnings and valuation, DFS or RM?

DFS Furniture has higher revenue and earnings than RM. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DFS Furniture	£987.10M	0.34	-£4.70M	-£0.02	-7,100.00
RM	£186.77M	0.50	-£47.98M	-£0.58	-192.24

Does the media favor DFS or RM?

In the previous week, DFS Furniture had 7 more articles in the media than RM. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DFS Furniture and 4 mentions for RM. DFS Furniture's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat RM's score of -0.03 indicating that DFS Furniture is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DFS Furniture	0 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
RM	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Do analysts recommend DFS or RM?

DFS Furniture currently has a consensus target price of GBX 120, indicating a potential downside of 15.49%. Given DFS Furniture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than RM.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DFS Furniture	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
RM	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in DFS or RM?

81.1% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Is DFS or RM more profitable?

DFS Furniture has a net margin of -0.45% compared to RM's net margin of -23.59%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of -2.02% beat RM's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DFS Furniture	-0.45%	-2.02%	3.00%
RM	-23.59%	-130.64%	-1.51%

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer DFS or RM?

DFS Furniture received 57 more outperform votes than RM when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 81.67% of users gave RM an outperform vote while only 72.77% of users gave DFS Furniture an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
DFS Furniture	Outperform Votes 302 72.77%	Underperform Votes 113 27.23%
RM	Outperform Votes 245 81.67%	Underperform Votes 55 18.33%

Is DFS or RM a better dividend stock?

DFS Furniture pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. DFS Furniture pays out -20,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RM pays out -1,379.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Which has more risk & volatility, DFS or RM?

DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 2.19, indicating that its share price is 119% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

DFS Furniture beats RM on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.