SDG vs. UPGS, HEAD, ULTP, CHH, CFX, VCP, LIKE, PMP, JLH, and HWDN
Should you be buying Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Sanderson Design Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Headlam Group (HEAD), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Churchill China (CHH), Colefax Group (CFX), Victoria (VCP), Likewise Group (LIKE), Portmeirion Group (PMP), John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH), and Howden Joinery Group (HWDN). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.
Sanderson Design Group vs.
UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, community ranking, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.
32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 7.55%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.
UP Global Sourcing received 55 more outperform votes than Sanderson Design Group when rated by MarketBeat users.
UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Global Sourcing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 3,636.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
In the previous week, UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.
UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Sanderson Design Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 12/18/2024 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free SDG Stock Alerts