SDG vs. UPGS, VCP, HEAD, CHH, ULTP, CFX, LIKE, PMP, JLH, and HWDN
Should you be buying Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Sanderson Design Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Victoria (VCP), Headlam Group (HEAD), Churchill China (CHH), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Colefax Group (CFX), Likewise Group (LIKE), Portmeirion Group (PMP), John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH), and Howden Joinery Group (HWDN). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.
Sanderson Design Group vs.
Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and community ranking.
In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled UP Global Sourcing'saverage media sentiment score.
UP Global Sourcing received 55 more outperform votes than Sanderson Design Group when rated by MarketBeat users.
Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays out 61.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
61.7% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.
UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 4.43%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.
Summary
UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Sanderson Design Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 4/19/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Buy SDG Stock Free SDG Stock Alerts