SML vs. ARS, POW, 1SN, EMH, PYX, RMR, LND, KAV, CLA, and FRG
Should you be buying Strategic Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Strategic Minerals include Asiamet Resources (ARS), Power Metal Resources (POW), First Tin (1SN), European Metals (EMH), PYX Resources (PYX), Rome Resources (RMR), Landore Resources (LND), Kavango Resources (KAV), Celsius Resources (CLA), and Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
Strategic Minerals vs.
Asiamet Resources (LON:ARS) and Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.
Asiamet Resources received 89 more outperform votes than Strategic Minerals when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 65.97% of users gave Strategic Minerals an outperform vote while only 64.11% of users gave Asiamet Resources an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Asiamet Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Asiamet Resources. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Asiamet Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
0.1% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.6% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Asiamet Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strategic Minerals. Asiamet Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Asiamet Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -293.94%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -224.54% beat Asiamet Resources' return on equity.
Asiamet Resources has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Asiamet Resources and Strategic Minerals tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Strategic Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Strategic Minerals Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:SML) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free SML Stock Alerts