Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT) Competitors

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income (LON:JSGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, community ranking, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Which has more risk and volatility, TENT or JSGI?

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor TENT or JSGI?

Triple Point Energy Transition and JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income both received 0 outperform votes by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Triple Point Energy Transition	N/A	N/A
JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income	N/A	N/A

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TENT or JSGI?

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Is TENT or JSGI a better dividend stock?

Triple Point Energy Transition pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 14 per share. Triple Point Energy Transition pays out -8,571.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income pays out 8,235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triple Point Energy Transition is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TENT or JSGI?

JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition	-£4.76M	-9.65	-£7.27M	-£0.07	-655.86
JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income	£10.36M	0.00	£9.17M	£0.17	N/A

Is TENT or JSGI more profitable?

JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income has a net margin of 88.53% compared to Triple Point Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income's return on equity of 4.67% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition	N/A	-7.81%	-4.86%
JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income	88.53%	4.67%	2.33%

Does the media refer more to TENT or JSGI?

In the previous week, Triple Point Energy Transition had 3 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income. Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Triple Point Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition	Positive
JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income	Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan Japan Small Cap Growth & Income beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.