Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT) Competitors

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Does the media refer more to TENT or CLIG?

In the previous week, City of London Investment Group had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London Investment Group and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. City of London Investment Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Triple Point Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that City of London Investment Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition	Neutral
City of London Investment Group	Positive

Is TENT or CLIG more profitable?

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 123.79% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.80%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 12.88% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition	123.79%	-15.06%	-4.86%
City of London Investment Group	27.80%	12.88%	7.65%

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in TENT or CLIG?

City of London Investment Group received 266 more outperform votes than Triple Point Energy Transition when rated by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Triple Point Energy Transition	N/A	N/A
City of London Investment Group	Outperform Votes 266 71.70%	Underperform Votes 105 28.30%

Which has more volatility & risk, TENT or CLIG?

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TENT or CLIG?

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.2% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Is TENT or CLIG a better dividend stock?

Triple Point Energy Transition pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 33 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Triple Point Energy Transition pays out -48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London Investment Group pays out 106.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Triple Point Energy Transition is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Which has better earnings and valuation, TENT or CLIG?

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition	-£9.97M	-4.56	-£12.35M	-£12.35	-3.69
City of London Investment Group	£54.04M	3.15	£15.02M	£31.08	11.32

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.