TI Fluid Systems (TIFS) Competitors

AB Dynamics (LON:ABDP) and TI Fluid Systems (LON:TIFS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, community ranking and media sentiment.

Is ABDP or TIFS a better dividend stock?

AB Dynamics pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. TI Fluid Systems pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. AB Dynamics pays out 1,186.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TI Fluid Systems pays out 4,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Which has more volatility and risk, ABDP or TIFS?

AB Dynamics has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TI Fluid Systems has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ABDP or TIFS?

40.9% of AB Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of TI Fluid Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of AB Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of TI Fluid Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Is ABDP or TIFS more profitable?

AB Dynamics has a net margin of 13.13% compared to TI Fluid Systems' net margin of 2.61%. TI Fluid Systems' return on equity of 13.64% beat AB Dynamics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AB Dynamics	13.13%	11.28%	3.80%
TI Fluid Systems	2.61%	13.64%	4.41%

Do analysts prefer ABDP or TIFS?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AB Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
TI Fluid Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in ABDP or TIFS?

AB Dynamics received 31 more outperform votes than TI Fluid Systems when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 68.27% of users gave AB Dynamics an outperform vote while only 67.15% of users gave TI Fluid Systems an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
AB Dynamics	Outperform Votes 170 68.27%	Underperform Votes 79 31.73%
TI Fluid Systems	Outperform Votes 139 67.15%	Underperform Votes 68 32.85%

Does the media prefer ABDP or TIFS?

In the previous week, AB Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than TI Fluid Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AB Dynamics and 3 mentions for TI Fluid Systems. AB Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat TI Fluid Systems' score of 0.27 indicating that AB Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AB Dynamics	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TI Fluid Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, ABDP or TIFS?

TI Fluid Systems has higher revenue and earnings than AB Dynamics. TI Fluid Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AB Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AB Dynamics	£104.41M	4.00	£13.71M	£0.59	3,084.75
TI Fluid Systems	£3.47B	0.28	£90.40M	£0.15	1,294.67

Summary

AB Dynamics beats TI Fluid Systems on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.