Tungsten West (TUN) Competitors

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, community ranking, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Which has more risk and volatility, FAR or TUN?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of -0.6, indicating that its stock price is 160% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media refer more to FAR or TUN?

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tungsten West'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Neutral
Tungsten West	Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, FAR or TUN?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£5.72M	7.49	-£9.69M	-£1.27	-5.53
Tungsten West	£804.19K	9.79	-£10.80M	-£4.70	-0.80

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FAR or TUN?

1.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. 50.9% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer FAR or TUN?

Ferro-Alloy Resources and Tungsten West both received 0 outperform votes by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Outperform Votes No Votes	Underperform Votes 18 100.00%
Tungsten West	N/A	N/A

Is FAR or TUN more profitable?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a net margin of -169.46% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of -44.58% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-169.46%	-98.37%	-21.47%
Tungsten West	-1,343.41%	-44.58%	-20.17%

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Tungsten West on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.