AATC vs. FEIM, RPID, SEER, AKYA, INTT, MASS, OWLT, PRE, OPTX, and OMIC
Should you be buying Autoscope Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Autoscope Technologies include Frequency Electronics (FEIM), Rapid Micro Biosystems (RPID), Seer (SEER), Akoya Biosciences (AKYA), inTEST (INTT), 908 Devices (MASS), Owlet (OWLT), Prenetics Global (PRE), Syntec Optics (OPTX), and Singular Genomics Systems (OMIC). These companies are all part of the "measuring and control equipment" industry.
Autoscope Technologies vs.
Autoscope Technologies (NASDAQ:AATC) and Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, community ranking, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.
Autoscope Technologies has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Autoscope Technologies has a net margin of 37.59% compared to Frequency Electronics' net margin of 13.02%. Autoscope Technologies' return on equity of 27.06% beat Frequency Electronics' return on equity.
In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 1 more articles in the media than Autoscope Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 0 mentions for Autoscope Technologies. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Autoscope Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Autoscope Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frequency Electronics. Autoscope Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 21.6% of Autoscope Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.1% of Frequency Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Frequency Electronics received 86 more outperform votes than Autoscope Technologies when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 60.14% of users gave Frequency Electronics an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Autoscope Technologies an outperform vote.
Summary
Frequency Electronics beats Autoscope Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Autoscope Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AATC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Autoscope Technologies Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:AATC) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free AATC Stock Alerts