Vita Coco (COCO) Competitors

Duckhorn Portfolio (NYSE:NAPA) and Vita Coco (NASDAQ:COCO) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, community ranking, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Which has more risk & volatility, NAPA or COCO?

Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vita Coco has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate NAPA or COCO?

Duckhorn Portfolio currently has a consensus target price of $9.85, indicating a potential downside of 10.62%. Vita Coco has a consensus target price of $31.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.88%. Given Vita Coco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vita Coco is more favorable than Duckhorn Portfolio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Duckhorn Portfolio	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Vita Coco	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Is NAPA or COCO more profitable?

Duckhorn Portfolio has a net margin of 13.81% compared to Vita Coco's net margin of 11.99%. Vita Coco's return on equity of 26.49% beat Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Duckhorn Portfolio	13.81%	6.24%	4.29%
Vita Coco	11.99%	26.49%	18.98%

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NAPA or COCO?

88.5% of Vita Coco shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Duckhorn Portfolio shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.2% of Vita Coco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has better valuation & earnings, NAPA or COCO?

Duckhorn Portfolio has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vita Coco. Duckhorn Portfolio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vita Coco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Duckhorn Portfolio	$405.48M	4.00	$56.01M	$0.47	23.45
Vita Coco	$494.86M	3.90	$46.63M	$0.99	34.36

Does the media prefer NAPA or COCO?

In the previous week, Vita Coco had 9 more articles in the media than Duckhorn Portfolio. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vita Coco and 1 mentions for Duckhorn Portfolio. Vita Coco's average media sentiment score of -0.25 beat Duckhorn Portfolio's score of -0.40 indicating that Vita Coco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Duckhorn Portfolio	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vita Coco	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Does the MarketBeat Community favor NAPA or COCO?

Duckhorn Portfolio received 15 more outperform votes than Vita Coco when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 63.27% of users gave Vita Coco an outperform vote while only 48.42% of users gave Duckhorn Portfolio an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Duckhorn Portfolio	Outperform Votes 46 48.42%	Underperform Votes 49 51.58%
Vita Coco	Outperform Votes 31 63.27%	Underperform Votes 18 36.73%

Summary

Vita Coco beats Duckhorn Portfolio on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.