EHTH vs. MMC, AON, AJG, BRO, SLQT, WDH, TWFG, GOCO, RDZN, and ZBAO
Should you be buying eHealth stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of eHealth include Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC), AON (AON), Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG), Brown & Brown (BRO), SelectQuote (SLQT), Waterdrop (WDH), TWFG (TWFG), GoHealth (GOCO), Roadzen (RDZN), and Zhibao Technology (ZBAO). These companies are all part of the "insurance agents, brokers, & service" industry.
eHealth vs.
Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE:MMC) and eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, community ranking, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.
Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 16.60% compared to eHealth's net margin of -7.58%. Marsh & McLennan Companies' return on equity of 32.60% beat eHealth's return on equity.
88.0% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.5% of eHealth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Marsh & McLennan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of eHealth shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher revenue and earnings than eHealth. eHealth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marsh & McLennan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Marsh & McLennan Companies currently has a consensus price target of $233.41, suggesting a potential downside of 1.22%. eHealth has a consensus price target of $6.38, suggesting a potential downside of 13.09%. Given Marsh & McLennan Companies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more favorable than eHealth.
Marsh & McLennan Companies received 24 more outperform votes than eHealth when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 61.61% of users gave eHealth an outperform vote while only 61.60% of users gave Marsh & McLennan Companies an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Marsh & McLennan Companies had 28 more articles in the media than eHealth. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Marsh & McLennan Companies and 6 mentions for eHealth. Marsh & McLennan Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat eHealth's score of 0.57 indicating that Marsh & McLennan Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, eHealth has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Marsh & McLennan Companies beats eHealth on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get eHealth News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EHTH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:EHTH) was last updated on 3/25/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff