Free Trial

L.B. Foster (FSTR) Competitors

L.B. Foster logo
$27.00 +0.11 (+0.41%)
(As of 11:07 AM ET)

FSTR vs. CMCO, PRLB, GRC, TRS, HY, ERII, GHM, PLL, NNBR, and EML

Should you be buying L.B. Foster stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of L.B. Foster include Columbus McKinnon (CMCO), Proto Labs (PRLB), Gorman-Rupp (GRC), TriMas (TRS), Hyster-Yale Materials Handling (HY), Energy Recovery (ERII), Graham (GHM), Piedmont Lithium (PLL), NN (NNBR), and Eastern (EML). These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery" industry.

L.B. Foster vs.

L.B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR) and Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, community ranking, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Columbus McKinnon has higher revenue and earnings than L.B. Foster. L.B. Foster is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbus McKinnon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
L.B. Foster$537.46M0.54$1.46M$3.896.91
Columbus McKinnon$1.00B1.05$46.62M$0.5369.13

In the previous week, Columbus McKinnon had 1 more articles in the media than L.B. Foster. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Columbus McKinnon and 1 mentions for L.B. Foster. Columbus McKinnon's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat L.B. Foster's score of 0.00 indicating that Columbus McKinnon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
L.B. Foster
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Columbus McKinnon
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

L.B. Foster presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.03%. Columbus McKinnon has a consensus price target of $51.50, indicating a potential upside of 40.56%. Given Columbus McKinnon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbus McKinnon is more favorable than L.B. Foster.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
L.B. Foster
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Columbus McKinnon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 7.96% compared to Columbus McKinnon's net margin of 1.51%. Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 9.20% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
L.B. Foster7.96% 6.01% 2.82%
Columbus McKinnon 1.51%9.20%4.50%

L.B. Foster pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Columbus McKinnon pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. L.B. Foster pays out 4.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Columbus McKinnon received 60 more outperform votes than L.B. Foster when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 61.37% of users gave Columbus McKinnon an outperform vote while only 57.07% of users gave L.B. Foster an outperform vote.

CompanyUnderperformOutperform
L.B. FosterOutperform Votes
226
57.07%
Underperform Votes
170
42.93%
Columbus McKinnonOutperform Votes
286
61.37%
Underperform Votes
180
38.63%

L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

80.6% of L.B. Foster shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by institutional investors. 6.2% of L.B. Foster shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Columbus McKinnon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Columbus McKinnon beats L.B. Foster on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSTR vs. The Competition

MetricL.B. FosterMetals service centers & offices IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$291.22M$13.19B$2.68B$8.98B
Dividend YieldN/A2.95%5.26%4.13%
P/E Ratio6.9113.75116.0016.99
Price / Sales0.540.41816,795.33115.43
Price / Cash17.567.8523.5438.38
Price / Book2.081.083.304.70
Net Income$1.46M$2.02B$149.47M$225.32M
7 Day Performance-6.01%-6.75%-3.25%-2.34%
1 Month Performance2.17%7.66%3.40%2.94%
1 Year Performance33.38%-19.99%16.63%16.90%

L.B. Foster Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSTR
L.B. Foster
4.1251 of 5 stars
$27.00
+0.4%
$25.00
-7.4%
+32.8%$292.41M$537.46M6.941,065
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
3.9382 of 5 stars
$38.87
-0.1%
$51.50
+32.5%
-6.4%$1.12B$1.00B73.573,515
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.0025 of 5 stars
$44.04
+1.0%
$40.33
-8.4%
+3.9%$1.08B$504.19M46.372,415Positive News
GRC
Gorman-Rupp
3.7403 of 5 stars
$41.09
+1.3%
N/A+13.7%$1.08B$657.53M27.971,450Positive News
TRS
TriMas
4.5139 of 5 stars
$26.01
0.0%
$40.00
+53.8%
-6.0%$1.06B$893.55M40.663,400
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
3.3951 of 5 stars
$54.62
-0.8%
$80.00
+46.5%
-16.6%$956.29M$4.27B6.188,600Gap Up
ERII
Energy Recovery
4.9642 of 5 stars
$16.31
+1.2%
$20.75
+27.2%
-18.8%$944.19M$128.35M47.38250Insider Trade
GHM
Graham
4.2382 of 5 stars
$45.34
+2.5%
$35.00
-22.8%
+114.8%$493.75M$196.40M62.28490
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
3.4682 of 5 stars
$10.70
+1.2%
$21.21
+98.3%
-70.8%$208.01M$39.82M-2.5840
NNBR
NN
2.981 of 5 stars
$3.90
-0.5%
$6.00
+53.8%
+23.1%$194.79M$470.31M-3.603,160News Coverage
Positive News
EML
Eastern
1.9769 of 5 stars
$28.99
flat
N/A+28.7%$179.25M$284.46M-28.151,199Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FSTR) was last updated on 12/20/2024 by MarketBeat.com Staff
From Our Partners