Frontier Communications Parent (FYBR) Competitors

Frontier Communications Parent (NASDAQ:FYBR) and Chunghwa Telecom (NYSE:CHT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, community ranking, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Do analysts rate FYBR or CHT?

Frontier Communications Parent currently has a consensus target price of $35.31, indicating a potential downside of 1.43%. Given Frontier Communications Parent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Frontier Communications Parent is more favorable than Chunghwa Telecom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Frontier Communications Parent	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Chunghwa Telecom	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, FYBR or CHT?

Chunghwa Telecom has higher revenue and earnings than Frontier Communications Parent. Frontier Communications Parent is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chunghwa Telecom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Communications Parent	$5.75B	1.55	$29M	-$0.75	-47.77
Chunghwa Telecom	$7.17B	4.22	$1.21B	$1.46	26.70

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FYBR or CHT?

2.1% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Frontier Communications Parent shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Is FYBR or CHT more profitable?

Chunghwa Telecom has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Frontier Communications Parent's net margin of -3.19%. Chunghwa Telecom's return on equity of 9.25% beat Frontier Communications Parent's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Frontier Communications Parent	-3.19%	-3.61%	-0.91%
Chunghwa Telecom	16.09%	9.25%	6.88%

Does the media favor FYBR or CHT?

In the previous week, Chunghwa Telecom had 1 more articles in the media than Frontier Communications Parent. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Chunghwa Telecom and 3 mentions for Frontier Communications Parent. Frontier Communications Parent's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Chunghwa Telecom's score of 0.79 indicating that Frontier Communications Parent is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Frontier Communications Parent	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chunghwa Telecom	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more risk & volatility, FYBR or CHT?

Frontier Communications Parent has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chunghwa Telecom has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor FYBR or CHT?

Chunghwa Telecom received 240 more outperform votes than Frontier Communications Parent when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 63.43% of users gave Chunghwa Telecom an outperform vote while only 53.25% of users gave Frontier Communications Parent an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Frontier Communications Parent	Outperform Votes 41 53.25%	Underperform Votes 36 46.75%
Chunghwa Telecom	Outperform Votes 281 63.43%	Underperform Votes 162 36.57%

Summary

Chunghwa Telecom beats Frontier Communications Parent on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.