KLA (KLAC) Competitors

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, community ranking and analyst recommendations.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer KLAC or AMAT?

Applied Materials received 1122 more outperform votes than KLA when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 71.94% of users gave Applied Materials an outperform vote while only 62.19% of users gave KLA an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
KLA	Outperform Votes 801 62.19%	Underperform Votes 487 37.81%
Applied Materials	Outperform Votes 1923 71.94%	Underperform Votes 750 28.06%

Do analysts rate KLAC or AMAT?

KLA presently has a consensus target price of $831.68, indicating a potential upside of 22.21%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $215.38, indicating a potential upside of 42.61%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68
Applied Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 29.58% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 22.95%. KLA's return on equity of 108.60% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	29.58%	108.60%	24.20%
Applied Materials	22.95%	39.50%	22.12%

Does the media refer more to KLAC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 13 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Applied Materials and 45 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Applied Materials' score of 1.28 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	42 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	43 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, KLAC or AMAT?

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$10.85B	8.34	$2.76B	$23.78	28.62
Applied Materials	$27.64B	4.44	$7.18B	$7.65	19.74

Which has more volatility & risk, KLAC or AMAT?

KLA has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Is KLAC or AMAT a better dividend stock?

KLA pays an annual dividend of $6.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. KLA pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in KLAC or AMAT?

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Applied Materials beats KLA on 11 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.