MAPS vs. BASE, MGIC, KIND, OSPN, CGNT, GRRR, RDVT, BMBL, SLP, and API
Should you be buying WM Technology stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of WM Technology include Couchbase (BASE), Magic Software Enterprises (MGIC), Nextdoor (KIND), OneSpan (OSPN), Cognyte Software (CGNT), Gorilla Technology Group (GRRR), Red Violet (RDVT), Bumble (BMBL), Simulations Plus (SLP), and Agora (API). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.
WM Technology vs.
WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Couchbase (NASDAQ:BASE) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, community ranking and profitability.
WM Technology has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Couchbase has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Couchbase received 59 more outperform votes than WM Technology when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 55.10% of users gave Couchbase an outperform vote while only 55.00% of users gave WM Technology an outperform vote.
WM Technology presently has a consensus target price of $2.61, suggesting a potential upside of 110.48%. Couchbase has a consensus target price of $22.19, suggesting a potential upside of 51.35%. Given WM Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe WM Technology is more favorable than Couchbase.
WM Technology has a net margin of -1.02% compared to Couchbase's net margin of -39.31%. WM Technology's return on equity of -1.68% beat Couchbase's return on equity.
WM Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Couchbase. Couchbase is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Couchbase had 2 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Couchbase and 3 mentions for WM Technology. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Couchbase's score of 1.16 indicating that WM Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.
22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Couchbase shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of WM Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.1% of Couchbase shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
WM Technology beats Couchbase on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get WM Technology News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAPS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
WM Technology Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:MAPS) was last updated on 3/28/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Buy MAPS Stock Free MAPS Stock Alerts