CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Rigel Resource Acquisition (NYSE:RRAC) are both small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, community ranking, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NOEM or RRAC?

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Does the media favor NOEM or RRAC?

In the previous week, CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Rigel Resource Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive
Rigel Resource Acquisition	Neutral

Is NOEM or RRAC more profitable?

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NOEM or RRAC?

71.8% of Rigel Resource Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 23.4% of Rigel Resource Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in NOEM or RRAC?

CO2 Energy Transition and Rigel Resource Acquisition both received 0 outperform votes by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition	N/A	N/A

Summary

Rigel Resource Acquisition beats CO2 Energy Transition on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.