CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM) Competitors

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Gladstone Land (NASDAQ:LAND) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Does the media prefer NOEM or LAND?

In the previous week, Gladstone Land had 6 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Gladstone Land and 1 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Gladstone Land's score of 0.89 indicating that CO2 Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition	Very Positive
Gladstone Land	Positive

Do analysts rate NOEM or LAND?

Gladstone Land has a consensus target price of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 41.67%. Given Gladstone Land's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Land is more favorable than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Gladstone Land	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of NOEM or LAND?

53.6% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Gladstone Land shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NOEM or LAND?

Gladstone Land has higher revenue and earnings than CO2 Energy Transition.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gladstone Land	$85.22M	4.35	$13.29M	-$0.25	-40.94

Is NOEM or LAND more profitable?

Gladstone Land has a net margin of 18.14% compared to CO2 Energy Transition's net margin of 0.00%. Gladstone Land's return on equity of 2.14% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CO2 Energy Transition	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gladstone Land	18.14%	2.14%	1.13%

Summary

Gladstone Land beats CO2 Energy Transition on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.