Interactive Strength (TRNR) Competitors

Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) and Polar Power (NASDAQ:POLA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, community ranking, earnings and risk.

Which has more risk and volatility, TRNR or POLA?

Interactive Strength has a beta of -1.49, meaning that its share price is 249% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Polar Power has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TRNR or POLA?

Polar Power has higher revenue and earnings than Interactive Strength. Polar Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Interactive Strength	$3.18M	0.57	-$51.37M	-$7.63 thousand	0.00
Polar Power	$14.95M	0.43	-$6.55M	-$2.31	-1.12

Does the media refer more to TRNR or POLA?

In the previous week, Polar Power had 1 more articles in the media than Interactive Strength. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Polar Power and 3 mentions for Interactive Strength. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Polar Power's score of 0.35 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Interactive Strength	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Polar Power	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in TRNR or POLA?

Polar Power received 230 more outperform votes than Interactive Strength when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Interactive Strength an outperform vote while only 50.66% of users gave Polar Power an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Interactive Strength	Outperform Votes 1 100.00%	Underperform Votes No Votes
Polar Power	Outperform Votes 231 50.66%	Underperform Votes 225 49.34%

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TRNR or POLA?

0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Polar Power shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Interactive Strength shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.5% of Polar Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Is TRNR or POLA more profitable?

Polar Power has a net margin of -31.99% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -1,275.51%. Interactive Strength's return on equity of 0.00% beat Polar Power's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Interactive Strength	-1,275.51%	N/A	-123.15%
Polar Power	-31.99%	-40.41%	-20.75%

Summary

Polar Power beats Interactive Strength on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.