G. Willi-Food International (WILC) Competitors

CrossAmerica Partners (NYSE:CAPL) and G. Willi-Food International (NASDAQ:WILC) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, community ranking and media sentiment.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer CAPL or WILC?

CrossAmerica Partners received 156 more outperform votes than G. Willi-Food International when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 66.56% of users gave G. Willi-Food International an outperform vote while only 64.20% of users gave CrossAmerica Partners an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
CrossAmerica Partners	Outperform Votes 355 64.20%	Underperform Votes 198 35.80%
G. Willi-Food International	Outperform Votes 199 66.56%	Underperform Votes 100 33.44%

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CAPL or WILC?

24.1% of CrossAmerica Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of G. Willi-Food International shares are held by institutional investors. 52.0% of CrossAmerica Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 79.1% of G. Willi-Food International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CAPL or WILC?

CrossAmerica Partners has higher revenue and earnings than G. Willi-Food International. G. Willi-Food International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CrossAmerica Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CrossAmerica Partners	$4.17B	0.21	$42.59M	$0.52	43.61
G. Willi-Food International	$149.78M	1.46	$8.73M	$1.13	13.96

Which has more risk & volatility, CAPL or WILC?

CrossAmerica Partners has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, G. Willi-Food International has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media refer more to CAPL or WILC?

In the previous week, CrossAmerica Partners had 2 more articles in the media than G. Willi-Food International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CrossAmerica Partners and 2 mentions for G. Willi-Food International. CrossAmerica Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat G. Willi-Food International's score of 0.59 indicating that CrossAmerica Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CrossAmerica Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
G. Willi-Food International	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Is CAPL or WILC a better dividend stock?

CrossAmerica Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. G. Willi-Food International pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. CrossAmerica Partners pays out 403.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. G. Willi-Food International pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Is CAPL or WILC more profitable?

G. Willi-Food International has a net margin of 9.79% compared to CrossAmerica Partners' net margin of 0.50%. G. Willi-Food International's return on equity of 10.29% beat CrossAmerica Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CrossAmerica Partners	0.50%	-104.40%	2.77%
G. Willi-Food International	9.79%	10.29%	9.26%

Summary

CrossAmerica Partners beats G. Willi-Food International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.