BRC (BRCC) Competitors

BRC (NYSE:BRCC) and Duckhorn Portfolio (NYSE:NAPA) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, community ranking, risk and analyst recommendations.

Does the media favor BRCC or NAPA?

In the previous week, BRC and BRC both had 1 articles in the media. Duckhorn Portfolio's average media sentiment score of -0.40 beat BRC's score of -0.98 indicating that Duckhorn Portfolio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
BRC	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Duckhorn Portfolio	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BRCC or NAPA?

Duckhorn Portfolio has higher revenue and earnings than BRC. BRC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Duckhorn Portfolio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BRC	$405.26M	1.58	-$16.75M	-$0.08	-37.75
Duckhorn Portfolio	$405.48M	4.00	$56.01M	$0.47	23.45

Do analysts rate BRCC or NAPA?

BRC presently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 115.23%. Duckhorn Portfolio has a consensus target price of $9.85, suggesting a potential downside of 10.62%. Given BRC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BRC is more favorable than Duckhorn Portfolio.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
BRC	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Duckhorn Portfolio	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

Is BRCC or NAPA more profitable?

Duckhorn Portfolio has a net margin of 13.81% compared to BRC's net margin of -1.22%. BRC's return on equity of 23.35% beat Duckhorn Portfolio's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BRC	-1.22%	23.35%	5.11%
Duckhorn Portfolio	13.81%	6.24%	4.29%

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BRCC or NAPA?

16.3% of BRC shares are held by institutional investors. 73.8% of BRC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Duckhorn Portfolio shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Which has more risk & volatility, BRCC or NAPA?

BRC has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Duckhorn Portfolio has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in BRCC or NAPA?

Duckhorn Portfolio received 24 more outperform votes than BRC when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 48.42% of users gave Duckhorn Portfolio an outperform vote while only 37.29% of users gave BRC an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
BRC	Outperform Votes 22 37.29%	Underperform Votes 37 62.71%
Duckhorn Portfolio	Outperform Votes 46 48.42%	Underperform Votes 49 51.58%

Summary

Duckhorn Portfolio beats BRC on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.