RSI vs. PLNT, LTH, MSGS, FUN, SGHC, BATRA, PRKS, MANU, IQ, and GENI
Should you be buying Rush Street Interactive stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Rush Street Interactive include Planet Fitness (PLNT), Life Time Group (LTH), Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS), Cedar Fair (FUN), Super Group (SGHC), Atlanta Braves (BATRA), United Parks & Resorts (PRKS), Manchester United (MANU), iQIYI (IQ), and Genius Sports (GENI). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.
Rush Street Interactive vs.
Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, community ranking and media sentiment.
Planet Fitness received 553 more outperform votes than Rush Street Interactive when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 73.77% of users gave Planet Fitness an outperform vote while only 65.93% of users gave Rush Street Interactive an outperform vote.
Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Rush Street Interactive had 8 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Rush Street Interactive and 7 mentions for Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Rush Street Interactive's score of 1.04 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Rush Street Interactive presently has a consensus price target of $15.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.24%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $101.44, indicating a potential upside of 3.96%. Given Rush Street Interactive's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Rush Street Interactive is more favorable than Planet Fitness.
Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Street Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Street Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 56.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Planet Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Planet Fitness has a net margin of 14.23% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of -0.16%. Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of -3.73% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.
Summary
Planet Fitness beats Rush Street Interactive on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Rush Street Interactive News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Rush Street Interactive Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NYSE:RSI) was last updated on 4/12/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
