CFW vs. BITF, VBNK, HIVE, PTS, WFC, ML, GRN, CARE, MSL, and FCF
Should you be buying Calfrac Well Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Calfrac Well Services include Bitfarms (BITF), VersaBank (VBNK), HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE), Points.com (PTS), Wall Financial (WFC), Millennial Lithium (ML), Greenlane Renewables Inc. (GRN.V) (GRN), Dialogue Health Technologies (CARE), Merus Labs International (MSL), and Founders Advantage Capital Corp. (FCF.V) (FCF). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.
Calfrac Well Services vs.
Calfrac Well Services (TSE:CFW) and Bitfarms (TSE:BITF) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, community ranking, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.
9.3% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.2% of Bitfarms shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Calfrac Well Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Bitfarms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Calfrac Well Services has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calfrac Well Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Calfrac Well Services received 502 more outperform votes than Bitfarms when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 80.00% of users gave Bitfarms an outperform vote while only 50.91% of users gave Calfrac Well Services an outperform vote.
Calfrac Well Services presently has a consensus target price of C$5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.21%. Bitfarms has a consensus target price of C$6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 247.59%. Given Bitfarms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than Calfrac Well Services.
In the previous week, Calfrac Well Services had 5 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Calfrac Well Services and 1 mentions for Bitfarms. Calfrac Well Services' average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Bitfarms' score of -0.09 indicating that Calfrac Well Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Calfrac Well Services has a net margin of 1.74% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -69.20%. Calfrac Well Services' return on equity of 4.42% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.
Calfrac Well Services has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.2, suggesting that its share price is 220% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Calfrac Well Services beats Bitfarms on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Calfrac Well Services News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CFW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Calfrac Well Services Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:CFW) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free CFW Stock Alerts