FURY vs. TMQ, ODV, GOLD, PTM, VGZ, AU, HAM, LN, SLR, and PGLC
Should you be buying Fury Gold Mines stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fury Gold Mines include Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Osisko Development (ODV), GoldMining (GOLD), Platinum Group Metals (PTM), Vista Gold (VGZ), Aurion Resources (AU), Highwood Asset Management (HAM), Loncor Gold (LN), Solitario Resources (SLR), and Pershing Gold (PGLC). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.
Fury Gold Mines vs.
Fury Gold Mines (TSE:FURY) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and community ranking.
Trilogy Metals received 102 more outperform votes than Fury Gold Mines when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Fury Gold Mines an outperform vote while only 63.79% of users gave Trilogy Metals an outperform vote.
Fury Gold Mines has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$1.25, indicating a potential downside of 33.86%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Fury Gold Mines.
In the previous week, Fury Gold Mines had 1 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fury Gold Mines and 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Fury Gold Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Fury Gold Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fury Gold Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
13.7% of Fury Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.3% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Fury Gold Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Fury Gold Mines' return on equity of -8.35% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.
Summary
Trilogy Metals beats Fury Gold Mines on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fury Gold Mines News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FURY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Fury Gold Mines Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:FURY) was last updated on 1/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
