GLO vs. EFR, CGO, EMO, CET, NCA, BUI, AVK, AEF, MCR, and HYI
Should you be buying Global Atomic stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Global Atomic include Energy Fuels (EFR), Cogeco (CGO), Emerita Resources (EMO), Cathedral Energy Services (CET), NewCastle Gold (NCA), Buhler Industries (BUI), Avnel Gold Mining (AVK), Acasta Enterprises (AEF), Macro Enterprises (MCR), and Horizons Active High Yield Bond ETF Common (HYI). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.
Global Atomic vs.
Global Atomic (TSE:GLO) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, community ranking, risk and media sentiment.
Energy Fuels has a net margin of -90.40% compared to Global Atomic's net margin of -955.83%. Global Atomic's return on equity of -4.19% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.
Global Atomic currently has a consensus price target of C$1.88, indicating a potential upside of 202.42%. Given Global Atomic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Atomic is more favorable than Energy Fuels.
15.4% of Global Atomic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Global Atomic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Global Atomic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Fuels. Global Atomic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Energy Fuels received 160 more outperform votes than Global Atomic when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 76.30% of users gave Energy Fuels an outperform vote while only 16.67% of users gave Global Atomic an outperform vote.
Global Atomic has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Global Atomic had 1 more articles in the media than Energy Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Global Atomic and 1 mentions for Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Global Atomic's score of -0.07 indicating that Energy Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Energy Fuels beats Global Atomic on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Global Atomic News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Global Atomic Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:GLO) was last updated on 4/15/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Buy GLO Stock Free GLO Stock Alerts