ORV vs. TMQ, GOLD, PTM, AU, VGZ, FURY, HAM, LN, PGLC, and SLR
Should you be buying Orvana Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Orvana Minerals include Trilogy Metals (TMQ), GoldMining (GOLD), Platinum Group Metals (PTM), Aurion Resources (AU), Vista Gold (VGZ), Fury Gold Mines (FURY), Highwood Asset Management (HAM), Loncor Gold (LN), Pershing Gold (PGLC), and Solitario Resources (SLR). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.
Orvana Minerals vs.
Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Orvana Minerals (TSE:ORV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, community ranking, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.
Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Orvana Minerals has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Orvana Minerals' net margin of -5.48%. Trilogy Metals' return on equity of -7.36% beat Orvana Minerals' return on equity.
42.3% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.0% of Orvana Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Orvana Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Orvana Minerals and 0 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Orvana Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Orvana Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Orvana Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orvana Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$2.38, indicating a potential upside of 21.79%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Orvana Minerals.
Orvana Minerals received 9 more outperform votes than Trilogy Metals when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 78.43% of users gave Orvana Minerals an outperform vote while only 62.71% of users gave Trilogy Metals an outperform vote.
Summary
Orvana Minerals beats Trilogy Metals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Orvana Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ORV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Orvana Minerals Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (TSE:ORV) was last updated on 4/18/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff