BOSTON (AP) — The parents of a high school senior in Massachusetts argued in federal court in Boston on Tuesday that their son was unfairly punished for using artificial intelligence while researching a history project, harming his prospects for acceptance to an elite college.
Lawyers for the couple said the lawsuit points to larger unaddressed questions about the role of AI in schools. A federal judge did not immediately issue a ruling Tuesday. The parents initially filed the case in state court, but it was bumped up to federal court by the defendants, according to a lawyer for the parents.
In one of his honors courses, Dale and Jennifer Harris said their son was paired with another student and chose to write a paper about basketball player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar as part of an assignment about a famous person also known for their civil rights activities.
At the time, the student’s teacher, Susan Petrie, did not prohibit the use of AI for preparation and research for the project, according to the lawsuit.
Despite that, when Petrie discovered the students' use of AI as part of their research, the Harrises said their son was given a low grade and required to attend a Saturday detention session, which kept him out of the National Honor Society and harmed his college prospects.
The chair of the Hingham School Committee, Nancy Correnti, which was also named in the lawsuit, said in an email that “out of respect for the student’s privacy and due to the ongoing legal proceedings, we are unable to provide any public comment on this matter at this time.”
A lawyer representing Petrie did not immediately return an email seeking comment.
“The case is now with the court,” Peter Farrell, a lawyer representing the parents said after the hearing. “We are going to let the court process play out.”
In a court filing, school officials defended their actions, saying the lawsuit isn’t about more serious disciplinary actions, like expulsion or even suspension.
He "received relatively lenient and measured discipline for a serious infraction, unauthorized use of Artificial Intelligence on a project and, equally important, failing to cite to his use of AI. In short, he cheated himself and other students, and he plagiarized,” the defendants said in the filing.
Petrie discovered the use of AI as she conducted spot checks on the students’ work, relying in part on a website designed to help flag copy generated by AI, which she found in some of the endnotes, according to the lawsuit.
The paper was never completed after the teacher discovered its use of AI. The high schooler received a zero and was allowed to start again. He was given a D on the second effort.
The lawsuit, which says the use of AI was not specifically prohibited by the school, is asking that the student's grade in Social Studies be restored to a B. It also asks the court to expunge any transcript of discipline.
The suit alleges that the actions of the teacher “violated their minor son's civil rights, right to equal education opportunity by denying him procedural and substantive due process.” The colleges the student was interested in attending, including Stanford University, don't consider applicants with histories of disciplinary infractions, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit also argued that the school's student handbook did not include policies related to AI.
The suit asks the court to block the defendants from referring to the use of artificial intelligence as cheating. It also asks the court to order school officials from continuing to bar the student from being inducted into the National Honor Society.
Farrell said content generated by AI isn’t the product of another human and can’t be classified as plagiarism.
“Instead, it represents an evolving collaboration between human creativity and machine assistance, a relationship that society must grapple with as AI continues to integrate into educational environments,” he said in a statement.
“There is currently much debate surrounding the proper role of AI in public schools, and unfortunately, this student has been caught in the middle of this transition," Farrell added.
Before you consider Harris, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Harris wasn't on the list.
While Harris currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Almost everyone loves strong dividend-paying stocks, but high yields can signal danger. Discover 20 high-yield dividend stocks paying an unsustainably large percentage of their earnings. Enter your email to get this report and avoid a high-yield dividend trap.
Get This Free Report
