FAR vs. CAPD, BSE, TRR, MNRG, ALL, KP2, JLP, EMH, PRE, and KOD
Should you be buying Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferro-Alloy Resources include Capital (CAPD), Base Resources (BSE), Trident Royalties (TRR), MetalNRG (MNRG), Atlantic Lithium (ALL), Kore Potash (KP2), Jubilee Metals Group (JLP), European Metals (EMH), Pensana (PRE), and Kodal Minerals (KOD). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
Ferro-Alloy Resources vs.
Capital (LON:CAPD) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, community ranking, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.
Capital has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.
51.4% of Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.9% of Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 50.9% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Capital has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -169.46%. Capital's return on equity of 10.91% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.
Capital received 223 more outperform votes than Ferro-Alloy Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 74.33% of users gave Capital an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Ferro-Alloy Resources an outperform vote.
Capital presently has a consensus target price of GBX 95, suggesting a potential upside of 57.70%. Given Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Capital is more favorable than Ferro-Alloy Resources.
In the previous week, Capital had 10 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Capital's score of -0.03 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Capital beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:FAR) was last updated on 3/27/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
