HEAD vs. UPGS, VCP, ULTP, CHH, CFX, LIKE, SDG, PMP, JLH, and HWDN
Should you be buying Headlam Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Headlam Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Victoria (VCP), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Churchill China (CHH), Colefax Group (CFX), Likewise Group (LIKE), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), Portmeirion Group (PMP), John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH), and Howden Joinery Group (HWDN). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.
Headlam Group vs.
Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.
Headlam Group received 112 more outperform votes than UP Global Sourcing when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 59.64% of users gave Headlam Group an outperform vote while only 51.89% of users gave UP Global Sourcing an outperform vote.
UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -1.98%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.
Headlam Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Headlam Group pays out -65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headlam Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Headlam Group has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Headlam Group had 4 more articles in the media than UP Global Sourcing. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for UP Global Sourcing. Headlam Group's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat UP Global Sourcing's score of 0.00 indicating that Headlam Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.
74.7% of Headlam Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Headlam Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
UP Global Sourcing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Global Sourcing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Headlam Group and UP Global Sourcing tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Headlam Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HEAD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart
Headlam Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:HEAD) was last updated on 3/28/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff