CLIR vs. FEIM, KEQU, NAUT, SEER, RPID, INTT, ODYS, AKYA, OWLT, and PRE
Should you be buying ClearSign Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of ClearSign Technologies include Frequency Electronics (FEIM), Kewaunee Scientific (KEQU), Nautilus Biotechnology (NAUT), Seer (SEER), Rapid Micro Biosystems (RPID), inTEST (INTT), Odysight.Ai (ODYS), Akoya Biosciences (AKYA), Owlet (OWLT), and Prenetics Global (PRE). These companies are all part of the "measuring and control equipment" industry.
ClearSign Technologies vs.
Frequency Electronics (NASDAQ:FEIM) and ClearSign Technologies (NASDAQ:CLIR) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, community ranking, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.
ClearSign Technologies received 64 more outperform votes than Frequency Electronics when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 60.69% of users gave Frequency Electronics an outperform vote while only 41.30% of users gave ClearSign Technologies an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Frequency Electronics had 9 more articles in the media than ClearSign Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Frequency Electronics and 2 mentions for ClearSign Technologies. Frequency Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat ClearSign Technologies' score of 0.50 indicating that Frequency Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Frequency Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than ClearSign Technologies. ClearSign Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frequency Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 13.02% compared to ClearSign Technologies' net margin of -118.93%. Frequency Electronics' return on equity of 21.49% beat ClearSign Technologies' return on equity.
ClearSign Technologies has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 686.47%. Given ClearSign Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ClearSign Technologies is more favorable than Frequency Electronics.
58.6% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of ClearSign Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.1% of Frequency Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of ClearSign Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
Frequency Electronics beats ClearSign Technologies on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get ClearSign Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLIR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
ClearSign Technologies Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:CLIR) was last updated on 3/26/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
