CNFR vs. FGF, OXBR, UNAM, KINS, TIPT, BRK.A, BRK.B, PGR, CB, and AIG
Should you be buying Conifer stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Conifer include Fundamental Global (FGF), Oxbridge Re (OXBR), Unico American (UNAM), Kingstone Companies (KINS), Tiptree (TIPT), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), Progressive (PGR), Chubb (CB), and American International Group (AIG). These companies are all part of the "fire, marine, & casualty insurance" industry.
Fundamental Global (NASDAQ:FGF) and Conifer (NASDAQ:CNFR) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, community ranking, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.
Fundamental Global has a net margin of -6.73% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of -27.43%. Conifer's return on equity of -7.08% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity.
Conifer has a consensus price target of $0.61, indicating a potential downside of 41.90%. Given Fundamental Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Conifer is more favorable than Fundamental Global.
Fundamental Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conifer. Fundamental Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conifer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
3.1% of Fundamental Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Conifer shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.7% of Fundamental Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 70.4% of Conifer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Conifer received 192 more outperform votes than Fundamental Global when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 57.83% of users gave Conifer an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Fundamental Global an outperform vote.
Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Conifer has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Fundamental Global and Fundamental Global both had 3 articles in the media. Fundamental Global's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Conifer's score of 0.30 indicating that Conifer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Conifer beats Fundamental Global on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Conifer News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
