Free Trial

Diamondback Energy (FANG) Competitors

Diamondback Energy logo
$154.94 +1.88 (+1.23%)
(As of 12/20/2024 05:45 PM ET)

FANG vs. COP, EOG, EQT, DVN, MRO, RRC, MTDR, CRK, SM, and KOS

Should you be buying Diamondback Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Diamondback Energy include ConocoPhillips (COP), EOG Resources (EOG), EQT (EQT), Devon Energy (DVN), Marathon Oil (MRO), Range Resources (RRC), Matador Resources (MTDR), Comstock Resources (CRK), SM Energy (SM), and Kosmos Energy (KOS). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

Diamondback Energy vs.

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, community ranking and profitability.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Diamondback Energy pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $210.70, indicating a potential upside of 35.99%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $136.71, indicating a potential upside of 43.72%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
ConocoPhillips
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.06

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 17 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 15 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.82 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ConocoPhillips
7 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 33.64% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 17.29%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 19.53% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy33.64% 13.68% 7.93%
ConocoPhillips 17.29%19.53%10.09%

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$9.58B4.72$3.14B$17.478.87
ConocoPhillips$55.24B1.98$10.96B$8.4111.31

Diamondback Energy received 302 more outperform votes than ConocoPhillips when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 78.17% of users gave Diamondback Energy an outperform vote while only 66.54% of users gave ConocoPhillips an outperform vote.

CompanyUnderperformOutperform
Diamondback EnergyOutperform Votes
1386
78.17%
Underperform Votes
387
21.83%
ConocoPhillipsOutperform Votes
1084
66.54%
Underperform Votes
545
33.46%

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats ConocoPhillips on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FANG vs. The Competition

MetricDiamondback EnergyCrude petroleum & natural gas IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$45.24B$7.85B$8.19B$9.07B
Dividend Yield2.27%23.60%11.67%4.22%
P/E Ratio8.8711.1712.1017.19
Price / Sales4.726.56109.62116.80
Price / Cash5.866.9410.7937.86
Price / Book1.591.723.334.78
Net Income$3.14B$1.20B$955.68M$225.60M
7 Day Performance-5.14%-4.77%-3.45%-1.24%
1 Month Performance-15.30%-9.18%-5.52%3.06%
1 Year Performance-0.84%-6.12%1.49%16.50%

Diamondback Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FANG
Diamondback Energy
4.8821 of 5 stars
$154.94
+1.2%
$210.70
+36.0%
-0.6%$45.24B$9.58B8.871,023Analyst Forecast
Positive News
High Trading Volume
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.9912 of 5 stars
$99.62
-1.4%
$139.24
+39.8%
-18.5%$114.65B$58.57B12.019,900Analyst Forecast
Insider Trade
EOG
EOG Resources
4.2524 of 5 stars
$124.51
-1.8%
$143.80
+15.5%
-2.0%$70.03B$24.19B10.213,050Analyst Forecast
Analyst Revision
EQT
EQT
4.5549 of 5 stars
$44.97
-1.4%
$46.61
+3.6%
+13.1%$26.83B$4.79B54.27740
DVN
Devon Energy
4.7409 of 5 stars
$32.71
-3.5%
$50.55
+54.5%
-32.0%$21.49B$15.68B6.291,900Analyst Forecast
MRO
Marathon Oil
1.0337 of 5 stars
$28.55
flat
$30.94
+8.4%
N/A$15.97B$6.70B12.251,681Analyst Forecast
RRC
Range Resources
3.9101 of 5 stars
$34.55
-2.3%
$35.50
+2.7%
+11.9%$8.34B$3.37B17.54540Analyst Forecast
MTDR
Matador Resources
4.6158 of 5 stars
$55.51
-2.1%
$75.00
+35.1%
-6.8%$6.93B$3.33B7.36290Analyst Forecast
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.6652 of 5 stars
$16.29
-3.0%
$11.78
-27.7%
+82.2%$4.76B$1.30B-93.33251
SM
SM Energy
4.6408 of 5 stars
$39.32
-2.7%
$50.82
+29.2%
-3.4%$4.50B$2.37B5.50540Analyst Forecast
KOS
Kosmos Energy
4.8183 of 5 stars
$2.71
-10.0%
$5.50
+103.0%
-54.9%$1.28B$1.79B6.05243Analyst Forecast
High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FANG) was last updated on 12/21/2024 by MarketBeat.com Staff
From Our Partners