Free Trial

ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

ConocoPhillips logo
$119.24 +0.20 (+0.16%)
As of 12:58 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

COP vs. APA, FANG, CVE, CVX, and DVN

Should you buy ConocoPhillips stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ConocoPhillips with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ConocoPhillips include APA (APA), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Chevron (CVX), and Devon Energy (DVN). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to APA?

APA (NASDAQ:APA) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

APA presently has a consensus target price of $40.96, suggesting a potential upside of 7.23%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $134.48, suggesting a potential upside of 12.78%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than APA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
APA
4 Sell rating(s)
18 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

APA has a net margin of 17.38% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. APA's return on equity of 20.70% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
APA17.38% 20.70% 8.14%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 36 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 3 mentions for APA. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat APA's score of 0.79 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
APA
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ConocoPhillips
26 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of APA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than APA. APA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
APA$9.22B1.46$1.43B$4.298.90
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.25

APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. APA pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

APA has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats APA on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Diamondback Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.25
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.83$1.66B$0.86237.59

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips12.10% 11.39% 6.03%
Diamondback Energy 1.87%7.76%4.67%

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 2 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 39 mentions for ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.00 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
26 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
21 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $134.48, suggesting a potential upside of 12.78%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $223.26, suggesting a potential upside of 9.27%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Diamondback Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Cenovus Energy?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus target price of $35.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.12%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $134.48, indicating a potential upside of 12.78%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.07
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 36 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 3 mentions for Cenovus Energy. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cenovus Energy's score of 1.05 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ConocoPhillips
26 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy9.53% 15.29% 7.83%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.57$2.81B$1.8216.40
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.25

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Cenovus Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Chevron?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $134.48, suggesting a potential upside of 12.78%. Chevron has a consensus target price of $205.70, suggesting a potential upside of 8.43%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Chevron.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Chevron
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chevron pays out 123.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chevron has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Chevron is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Chevron had 36 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 75 mentions for Chevron and 39 mentions for ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Chevron's score of 0.71 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
26 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chevron
39 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
8 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Chevron's net margin of 5.79%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Chevron's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips12.10% 11.39% 6.03%
Chevron 5.79%6.90%4.06%

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.4% of Chevron shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Chevron shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chevron has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.25
Chevron$189.03B2.00$12.30B$5.7732.88

Summary

Chevron beats ConocoPhillips on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B1.67$2.64B$3.5912.84
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.36$7.99B$5.8920.25

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $57.89, indicating a potential upside of 25.60%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $134.48, indicating a potential upside of 12.78%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 8 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Devon Energy and 39 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.08 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
30 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ConocoPhillips
26 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy13.71% 15.22% 7.39%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Devon Energy beats ConocoPhillips on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ConocoPhillips News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for COP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding COP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

COP vs. The Competition

MetricConocoPhillipsOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$145.19B$17.21B$10.39B$23.31B
Dividend Yield2.88%2.50%10.42%4.06%
P/E Ratio20.2326.1521.1231.05
Price / Sales2.365.66810.3624.14
Price / Cash7.3618.6338.7024.93
Price / Book2.282.674.394.70
Net Income$7.99B$788.29M$4.23B$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.79%1.67%1.93%-0.37%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/AN/A2.01%
1 Year Performance38.66%21.27%51.57%26.02%

ConocoPhillips Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.0479 of 5 stars
$119.25
+0.2%
$134.48
+12.8%
+35.6%$145.19B$61.55B20.239,900
APA
APA
3.0955 of 5 stars
$38.80
flat
$40.12
+3.4%
+109.8%$13.71B$9.22B9.041,791
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.2304 of 5 stars
$200.71
flat
$221.84
+10.5%
+48.0%$56.46B$15.11B233.391,762
CVE
Cenovus Energy
3.9401 of 5 stars
$30.04
0.0%
$35.25
+17.4%
+117.3%$56.31B$35.57B16.507,211
CVX
Chevron
4.3354 of 5 stars
$191.51
+0.0%
$204.22
+6.6%
+36.2%$381.42B$189.03B33.1943,039

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:COP) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners