FAT vs. FLL, GENK, MRNO, LVO, THCH, STKS, CNTY, NDLS, FATBB, and ARKR
Should you be buying FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FAT Brands include Full House Resorts (FLL), GEN Restaurant Group (GENK), Murano Global Investments (MRNO), LiveOne (LVO), TH International (THCH), ONE Group Hospitality (STKS), Century Casinos (CNTY), Noodles & Company (NDLS), FAT Brands (FATBB), and Ark Restaurants (ARKR). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.
FAT Brands vs.
Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, community ranking, dividends and earnings.
Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FAT Brands has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Full House Resorts' score of 0.00 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
FAT Brands received 2 more outperform votes than Full House Resorts when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 62.88% of users gave Full House Resorts an outperform vote while only 61.31% of users gave FAT Brands an outperform vote.
Full House Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.33%. Given Full House Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Full House Resorts is more favorable than FAT Brands.
Full House Resorts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FAT Brands. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FAT Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Full House Resorts has a net margin of -14.64% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of -24.53%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Full House Resorts' return on equity.
37.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of FAT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Full House Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of FAT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
Full House Resorts beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
FAT Brands Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:FAT) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
Free FAT Stock Alerts