HF Foods Group (HFFG) Competitors

HF Foods Group (NASDAQ:HFFG) and Climb Global Solutions (NASDAQ:CLMB) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, community ranking, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Do analysts rate HFFG or CLMB?

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus target price of $136.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.48%. Given Climb Global Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Climb Global Solutions is more favorable than HF Foods Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HF Foods Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Climb Global Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in HFFG or CLMB?

Climb Global Solutions received 2 more outperform votes than HF Foods Group when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 91.67% of users gave Climb Global Solutions an outperform vote while only 42.86% of users gave HF Foods Group an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
HF Foods Group	Outperform Votes 9 42.86%	Underperform Votes 12 57.14%
Climb Global Solutions	Outperform Votes 11 91.67%	Underperform Votes 1 8.33%

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HFFG or CLMB?

24.0% of HF Foods Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of Climb Global Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of HF Foods Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Climb Global Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Which has more volatility and risk, HFFG or CLMB?

HF Foods Group has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has better earnings & valuation, HFFG or CLMB?

Climb Global Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HF Foods Group. HF Foods Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Climb Global Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HF Foods Group	$1.15B	0.13	-$2.17M	-$0.03	-92.67
Climb Global Solutions	$352.01M	1.70	$12.32M	$3.69	35.28

Does the media refer more to HFFG or CLMB?

In the previous week, Climb Global Solutions had 3 more articles in the media than HF Foods Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Climb Global Solutions and 1 mentions for HF Foods Group. HF Foods Group's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Climb Global Solutions' score of 0.62 indicating that HF Foods Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HF Foods Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Climb Global Solutions	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Is HFFG or CLMB more profitable?

Climb Global Solutions has a net margin of 4.11% compared to HF Foods Group's net margin of -0.16%. Climb Global Solutions' return on equity of 23.63% beat HF Foods Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HF Foods Group	-0.16%	6.96%	3.30%
Climb Global Solutions	4.11%	23.63%	5.76%

Summary

Climb Global Solutions beats HF Foods Group on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.