Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

$3.72 -0.04 (-0.96%)

As of 12:57 PM Eastern

SANG vs. OSPN, WEAV, PUBM, DCBO, and BLZE

Should you buy Sangoma Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sangoma Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sangoma Technologies include Onespan (OSPN), Weave Communications (WEAV), PubMatic (PUBM), Docebo (DCBO), and Backblaze (BLZE). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Onespan?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Onespan (NASDAQ:OSPN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Sangoma Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Onespan has a consensus target price of $16.67, indicating a potential upside of 16.63%. Given Onespan's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Onespan is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Onespan	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Onespan shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Onespan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Onespan had 1 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Onespan and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Onespan's score of 0.97 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
Onespan	Positive

Onespan has a net margin of 28.47% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. Onespan's return on equity of 18.03% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
Onespan	28.47%	18.03%	12.47%

Onespan has higher revenue and earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onespan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.52	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
Onespan	$243.18M	2.18	$72.90M	$1.81	7.90

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Onespan has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Onespan beats Sangoma Technologies on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Weave Communications (NYSE:WEAV) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Sangoma Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Weave Communications. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Weave Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.52	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
Weave Communications	$239.02M	2.01	-$28.05M	-$0.31	N/A

Sangoma Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Weave Communications has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.43%. Given Weave Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Weave Communications is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Weave Communications	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, Sangoma Technologies and Sangoma Technologies both had 1 articles in the media. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Weave Communications' score of 0.34 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
Weave Communications	Neutral

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weave Communications has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Weave Communications' net margin of -10.05%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.26% beat Weave Communications' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
Weave Communications	-10.05%	-26.46%	-10.39%

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Weave Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Weave Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Weave Communications beats Sangoma Technologies on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to PubMatic?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and PubMatic (NASDAQ:PUBM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PubMatic has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Sangoma Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. PubMatic has a consensus target price of $12.88, suggesting a potential upside of 10.09%. Given PubMatic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PubMatic is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
PubMatic	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of PubMatic shares are held by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.8% of PubMatic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PubMatic had 3 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for PubMatic and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat PubMatic's score of 0.55 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
PubMatic	Positive

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -3.04% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -6.21%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.26% beat PubMatic's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
PubMatic	-6.21%	-6.98%	-2.60%

Sangoma Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PubMatic. PubMatic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sangoma Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.52	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
PubMatic	$282.93M	1.92	-$14.46M	-$0.38	N/A

Summary

PubMatic beats Sangoma Technologies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) and Docebo (NASDAQ:DCBO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Docebo has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Docebo has higher revenue and earnings than Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.52	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A
Docebo	$242.69M	1.93	$37.51M	$1.16	15.91

In the previous week, Docebo had 3 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Docebo and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Docebo's score of -0.28 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive
Docebo	Neutral

Sangoma Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Docebo has a consensus target price of $30.67, indicating a potential upside of 66.21%. Given Docebo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Docebo is more favorable than Sangoma Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sangoma Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Docebo	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Docebo shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Docebo has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Sangoma Technologies' net margin of -3.04%. Docebo's return on equity of 93.49% beat Sangoma Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%
Docebo	13.71%	93.49%	17.82%

Summary

Docebo beats Sangoma Technologies on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Backblaze?

Backblaze (NASDAQ:BLZE) and Sangoma Technologies (NASDAQ:SANG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

54.0% of Backblaze shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Backblaze shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Sangoma Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Backblaze had 4 more articles in the media than Sangoma Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Backblaze and 1 mentions for Sangoma Technologies. Sangoma Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Backblaze's score of 1.31 indicating that Sangoma Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Backblaze	Positive
Sangoma Technologies	Very Positive

Backblaze currently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.42%. Sangoma Technologies has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Sangoma Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sangoma Technologies is more favorable than Backblaze.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Backblaze	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Sangoma Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Backblaze has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sangoma Technologies has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Sangoma Technologies has a net margin of -3.04% compared to Backblaze's net margin of -14.97%. Sangoma Technologies' return on equity of -2.26% beat Backblaze's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Backblaze	-14.97%	-20.54%	-8.90%
Sangoma Technologies	-3.04%	-2.26%	-1.71%

Sangoma Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Backblaze. Backblaze is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sangoma Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Backblaze	$145.84M	3.34	-$25.61M	-$0.39	N/A
Sangoma Technologies	$236.69M	0.52	-$5.01M	-$0.19	N/A

Summary

Sangoma Technologies beats Backblaze on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sangoma Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SANG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SANG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sangoma Technologies	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$123.60M	$17.71B	$40.29B	$12.60B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.93%	3.18%	5.26%
P/E Ratio	-19.55	61.99	79.89	26.32
Price / Sales	0.52	46.56	624.01	114.49
Price / Cash	3.87	66.52	48.68	56.90
Price / Book	0.50	9.79	10.71	7.34
Net Income	-$5.01M	$383.77M	$1.06B	$337.06M
7 Day Performance	3.30%	6.08%	3.71%	3.67%
1 Month Performance	-12.02%	11.16%	12.68%	7.41%
1 Year Performance	-35.18%	-1.94%	170.16%	37.93%

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SANG Sangoma Technologies	1.9623 of 5 stars	$3.72 -1.0%	$4.00 +7.4%	-35.8%	$123.60M	$236.69M	N/A	730	Positive News Gap Down
OSPN Onespan	3.963 of 5 stars	$12.88 +3.1%	$16.67 +29.4%	-12.2%	$477.61M	$245.76M	7.12	790
WEAV Weave Communications	2.4675 of 5 stars	$5.89 +1.5%	$10.00 +69.9%	-39.8%	$468.27M	$239.02M	N/A	890
PUBM PubMatic	2.554 of 5 stars	$9.89 -1.7%	$12.88 +30.1%	-5.7%	$459.43M	$282.93M	N/A	1,030	Insider Trade
DCBO Docebo	4.4852 of 5 stars	$17.61 +1.2%	$30.92 +75.6%	-33.0%	$447.29M	$242.69M	15.18	730	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SANG) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

SANG vs. OSPN, WEAV, PUBM, DCBO, and BLZE

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Onespan?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to PubMatic?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Backblaze?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SANG vs. The Competition

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sangoma Technologies (SANG) Competitors

SANG vs. OSPN, WEAV, PUBM, DCBO, and BLZE

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Onespan?

Do analysts prefer SANG or OSPN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SANG or OSPN?

Does the media refer more to SANG or OSPN?

Is SANG or OSPN more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, SANG or OSPN?

Which has more risk and volatility, SANG or OSPN?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Weave Communications?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SANG or WEAV?

Do analysts rate SANG or WEAV?

Does the media refer more to SANG or WEAV?

Which has more volatility & risk, SANG or WEAV?

Is SANG or WEAV more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SANG or WEAV?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to PubMatic?

Which has more volatility and risk, SANG or PUBM?

Do analysts prefer SANG or PUBM?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SANG or PUBM?

Does the media favor SANG or PUBM?

Is SANG or PUBM more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SANG or PUBM?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Docebo?

Which has more volatility & risk, SANG or DCBO?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SANG or DCBO?

Does the media refer more to SANG or DCBO?

Do analysts prefer SANG or DCBO?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SANG or DCBO?

Is SANG or DCBO more profitable?

Summary

How does Sangoma Technologies compare to Backblaze?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BLZE or SANG?

Does the media prefer BLZE or SANG?

Do analysts recommend BLZE or SANG?

Which has more volatility & risk, BLZE or SANG?

Is BLZE or SANG more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BLZE or SANG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SANG vs. The Competition

Sangoma Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools