TUSK vs. GFR, RNGR, PNRG, TBN, AMPY, GTE, EPSN, PROP, MVO, and KLXE
Should you be buying Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Mammoth Energy Services include Greenfire Resources (GFR), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), PrimeEnergy Resources (PNRG), Tamboran Resources (TBN), Amplify Energy (AMPY), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), Epsilon Energy (EPSN), Prairie Operating (PROP), MV Oil Trust (MVO), and KLX Energy Services (KLXE). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.
Mammoth Energy Services vs.
Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, community ranking, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.
Mammoth Energy Services received 284 more outperform votes than Greenfire Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Greenfire Resources an outperform vote while only 67.22% of users gave Mammoth Energy Services an outperform vote.
79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Mammoth Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenfire Resources. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenfire Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.84%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.
In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 2 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 1 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.97 indicating that Greenfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 5.02% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -105.49%. Greenfire Resources' return on equity of 5.40% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.
Summary
Greenfire Resources beats Mammoth Energy Services on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TUSK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 1/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
