Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate TUSK or NOA?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.82% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -18.13%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 17.15% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-18.13%	-29.24%	-19.35%
North American Construction Group	2.82%	17.15%	4.16%

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$187.93M	0.61	-$207.33M	-$0.65	-3.63
North American Construction Group	$850.88M	0.48	$32.17M	$0.87	15.67

Does the media favor TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 4 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.44 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Very Positive
North American Construction Group	Neutral

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or NOA?

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.