TUSK vs. NOA, GPRK, GFR, RNGR, TBN, PNRG, AMPY, GTE, PROP, and NEHC
Should you be buying Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Mammoth Energy Services include North American Construction Group (NOA), GeoPark (GPRK), Greenfire Resources (GFR), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), Tamboran Resources (TBN), PrimeEnergy Resources (PNRG), Amplify Energy (AMPY), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), Prairie Operating (PROP), and New Era Helium (NEHC). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.
Mammoth Energy Services vs.
Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, community ranking, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.
North American Construction Group has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -105.49%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 26.00% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.
In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 2 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat North American Construction Group's score of 1.17 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.
North American Construction Group received 97 more outperform votes than Mammoth Energy Services when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 69.58% of users gave North American Construction Group an outperform vote while only 67.22% of users gave Mammoth Energy Services an outperform vote.
North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TUSK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff