Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, community ranking, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -105.49%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 26.00% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-105.49%	-53.85%	-35.56%
North American Construction Group	4.79%	26.00%	6.03%

Does the media prefer TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 2 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat North American Construction Group's score of 1.17 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Do analysts rate TUSK or NOA?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

Which has more volatility and risk, TUSK or NOA?

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group received 97 more outperform votes than Mammoth Energy Services when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 69.58% of users gave North American Construction Group an outperform vote while only 67.22% of users gave Mammoth Energy Services an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Mammoth Energy Services	Outperform Votes 285 67.22%	Underperform Votes 139 32.78%
North American Construction Group	Outperform Votes 382 69.58%	Underperform Votes 167 30.42%

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$309.49M	0.42	-$3.16M	-$4.12	-0.65
North American Construction Group	$1.18B	0.43	$46.78M	$1.44	12.83

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or NOA?

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.