Energy Fuels (EFR) Competitors

Cogeco Communications (TSE:CCA) and Energy Fuels (TSE:EFR) are both communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, community ranking, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cogeco Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cogeco Communications	C$2.97B	0.95	C$346.48M	C$8.26	8.08
Energy Fuels	C$32.84M	25.61	-C$29.68M	-C$0.30	-20.06

Which has more risk and volatility, CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications presently has a consensus target price of C$76.17, indicating a potential upside of 14.11%. Given Cogeco Communications' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cogeco Communications is more favorable than Energy Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cogeco Communications	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Energy Fuels	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Is CCA or EFR more profitable?

Cogeco Communications has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Energy Fuels' net margin of -90.40%. Cogeco Communications' return on equity of 11.56% beat Energy Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cogeco Communications	11.68%	11.56%	4.96%
Energy Fuels	-90.40%	-9.25%	-4.04%

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CCA or EFR?

43.4% of Cogeco Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Cogeco Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Does the media favor CCA or EFR?

In the previous week, Energy Fuels had 4 more articles in the media than Cogeco Communications. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Energy Fuels and 1 mentions for Cogeco Communications. Cogeco Communications' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Energy Fuels' score of 0.35 indicating that Cogeco Communications is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cogeco Communications	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Fuels	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in CCA or EFR?

Cogeco Communications received 248 more outperform votes than Energy Fuels when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 76.30% of users gave Energy Fuels an outperform vote while only 59.19% of users gave Cogeco Communications an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Cogeco Communications	Outperform Votes 409 59.19%	Underperform Votes 282 40.81%
Energy Fuels	Outperform Votes 161 76.30%	Underperform Votes 50 23.70%

Summary

Cogeco Communications beats Energy Fuels on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.