EXPD vs. XPO, RKLB, CHRW, HUBG, ATSG, FWRD, PKOH, UPS, FDX, and BCO
Should you be buying Expeditors International of Washington stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Expeditors International of Washington include XPO (XPO), Rocket Lab USA (RKLB), C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW), Hub Group (HUBG), Air Transport Services Group (ATSG), Forward Air (FWRD), Park-Ohio (PKOH), United Parcel Service (UPS), FedEx (FDX), and Brink's (BCO).
Expeditors International of Washington vs.
XPO (NYSE:XPO) and Expeditors International of Washington (NASDAQ:EXPD) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, community ranking, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.
In the previous week, Expeditors International of Washington had 22 more articles in the media than XPO. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Expeditors International of Washington and 7 mentions for XPO. XPO's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Expeditors International of Washington's score of 0.69 indicating that XPO is being referred to more favorably in the media.
XPO presently has a consensus target price of $161.13, indicating a potential upside of 29.23%. Expeditors International of Washington has a consensus target price of $116.56, indicating a potential upside of 0.98%. Given XPO's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe XPO is more favorable than Expeditors International of Washington.
Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 7.64% compared to XPO's net margin of 4.81%. Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 36.16% beat XPO's return on equity.
XPO has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.
97.7% of XPO shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of XPO shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Expeditors International of Washington shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Expeditors International of Washington has higher revenue and earnings than XPO. Expeditors International of Washington is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than XPO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
XPO received 796 more outperform votes than Expeditors International of Washington when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 77.81% of users gave XPO an outperform vote while only 49.22% of users gave Expeditors International of Washington an outperform vote.
Summary
XPO beats Expeditors International of Washington on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Expeditors International of Washington News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EXPD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Expeditors International of Washington Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:EXPD) was last updated on 2/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
