FGF vs. RDZN, ICCH, NEUE, ZBAO, AAME, HUIZ, OXBR, CNFR, TIRX, and UNAM
Should you be buying Fundamental Global stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fundamental Global include Roadzen (RDZN), ICC (ICCH), NeueHealth (NEUE), Zhibao Technology (ZBAO), Atlantic American (AAME), Huize (HUIZ), Oxbridge Re (OXBR), Conifer (CNFR), Tian Ruixiang (TIRX), and Unico American (UNAM). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.
Fundamental Global vs.
Fundamental Global (NASDAQ:FGF) and Roadzen (NASDAQ:RDZN) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, community ranking, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.
Fundamental Global has a net margin of 20.87% compared to Roadzen's net margin of -248.79%. Roadzen's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity.
Roadzen received 3 more outperform votes than Fundamental Global when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave Roadzen an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Fundamental Global an outperform vote.
Fundamental Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Roadzen. Roadzen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fundamental Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Roadzen had 2 more articles in the media than Fundamental Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Roadzen and 0 mentions for Fundamental Global. Roadzen's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Fundamental Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Roadzen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Roadzen has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 358.72%. Given Roadzen's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Roadzen is more favorable than Fundamental Global.
3.1% of Fundamental Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.7% of Roadzen shares are held by institutional investors. 34.4% of Fundamental Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roadzen has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Roadzen beats Fundamental Global on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fundamental Global News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FGF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Fundamental Global Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:FGF) was last updated on 2/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
