SEAT vs. RSI, PRKS, SGHC, MANU, BATRA, GENI, OSW, BATRK, IQ, and MSGE
Should you be buying Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Vivid Seats include Rush Street Interactive (RSI), United Parks & Resorts (PRKS), Super Group (SGHC), Manchester United (MANU), Atlanta Braves (BATRA), Genius Sports (GENI), OneSpaWorld (OSW), Atlanta Braves (BATRK), iQIYI (IQ), and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.
Vivid Seats vs.
Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, community ranking and earnings.
Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Rush Street Interactive received 21 more outperform votes than Vivid Seats when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 64.71% of users gave Rush Street Interactive an outperform vote while only 47.22% of users gave Vivid Seats an outperform vote.
24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 56.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.2% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Vivid Seats has a net margin of 4.56% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of -0.16%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 21.29% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity.
Vivid Seats has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.82%. Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $6.63, suggesting a potential upside of 38.60%. Given Vivid Seats' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Rush Street Interactive.
In the previous week, Rush Street Interactive had 1 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Rush Street Interactive and 24 mentions for Vivid Seats. Rush Street Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.05 indicating that Rush Street Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Vivid Seats beats Rush Street Interactive on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Vivid Seats Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:SEAT) was last updated on 1/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff